Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] iommu: Add attachment handle to struct iopf_group

[Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>]

On 2024/5/15 15:31, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 10:57 PM
>>
>> Previously, the domain that a page fault targets is stored in an
>> iopf_group, which represents a minimal set of page faults. With the
>> introduction of attachment handle, replace the domain with the handle
> 
> It's better to use 'attach handle' as the code does.

Done.

> 
>> +	handle = iommu_attach_handle_get(dev->iommu_group, pasid, 0);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(handle))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(handle);
>>
>> -	if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler) {
>> -		dev_warn_ratelimited(dev,
>> -			"iopf (pasid %d) without domain attached or handler
>> installed\n",
>> -			 fault->prm.pasid);
>> +	group->attach_handle = handle;
>> +	group->domain = handle->domain;
> 
> this change also removes the warning message. Is it desired?

Not desired.

Perhaps we can add a message when the iopf handling is aborted.
Something like below:

err_abort:
+        dev_warn_ratelimited(dev, "iopf with pasid %d aborted\n",
+                             fault->prm.pasid);
         iopf_group_response(group, IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_FAILURE);

Though I am not sure which is better dev_warn() or dev_info().

Best regards,
baolu