Re: [RFC PATCH v1] vsock: add mergeable rx buffer description

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

在 2021/6/11 上午2:39, Jiang Wang 写道:
> Mergeable rx buffer is already supported by virtio-net, and
> it can save memory for big packets. It will also be beneficial
> for the vsock devices, so add it to the spec.


A lot of duplication with the virtio-net mergeable rx buffer description.

I wonder whether we can have a generic feature like VIRTIO_F_MRG_BUFFER 
instead.


>
> ---
> V0 -> V1: I send similar patch with vsock dgram before and
> already got some comments. This version fixed those,such as
> use present tense for feature bit etc. Also the feature bit
> value is 3, because we expect to have some other featue bits
> defined soon.
>
>   virtio-vsock.tex | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/virtio-vsock.tex b/virtio-vsock.tex
> index da7e641..d529291 100644
> --- a/virtio-vsock.tex
> +++ b/virtio-vsock.tex
> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ \subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Virtqueues}
>   
>   \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Feature bits}
>   
> -There are currently no feature bits defined for this device.
> +\begin{description}
> +\item[VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF (3)] Driver can merge receive buffers.
> +\end{description}
>   
>   \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device configuration layout}
>   
> @@ -64,6 +66,8 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device Op
>   
>   Packets transmitted or received contain a header before the payload:
>   
> +If feature VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is not negotiated, use the following header.
> +
>   \begin{lstlisting}
>   struct virtio_vsock_hdr {
>   	le64 src_cid;
> @@ -79,6 +83,15 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device Op
>   };
>   \end{lstlisting}
>   
> +If feature VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is negotiated, use the following header.
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +struct virtio_vsock_hdr_mrg_rxbuf {
> +	struct virtio_vsock_hdr hdr;
> +	le16 num_buffers;
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +
>   The upper 32 bits of src_cid and dst_cid are reserved and zeroed.
>   
>   Most packets simply transfer data but control packets are also used for
> @@ -170,6 +183,23 @@ \subsubsection{Buffer Space Management}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device /
>   previously receiving a VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_REQUEST packet. This allows
>   communicating updates any time a change in buffer space occurs.
>   
> +\drivernormative{\paragraph}{Device Operation: Buffer Space Management}{Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Setting Up Receive Buffers}
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is negotiated, each buffer MUST be at
> +least the size of the struct virtio_vsock_hdr_mgr_rxbuf.
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +\begin{note}
> +Obviously each buffer can be split across multiple descriptor elements.
> +\end{note}
> +
> +\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Device Operation: Buffer Space Management}{Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Setting Up Receive Buffers}
> +The device MUST set \field{num_buffers} to the number of descriptors used when
> +transmitting the  packet.


Interesting, does this mean it works for tx? Virtio-net had:

"The driver MUST set num_buffers to zero."



> +
> +The device MUST use only a single descriptor if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF
> +is not negotiated.


Though virtio-net using something similar. But I think we need to 
clarify, what we really need is "a single buffer" not "a single descriptor".


> +
>   \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Device Operation: Buffer Space Management}{Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Buffer Space Management}
>   VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW data packets MUST only be transmitted when the peer has
>   sufficient free buffer space for the payload.
> @@ -188,6 +218,7 @@ \subsubsection{Receive and Transmit}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / De
>   The driver queues outgoing packets on the tx virtqueue and incoming packet
>   receive buffers on the rx virtqueue. Packets are of the following form:
>   
> +If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is not negotiated, use the following.
>   \begin{lstlisting}
>   struct virtio_vsock_packet {
>       struct virtio_vsock_hdr hdr;
> @@ -195,9 +226,41 @@ \subsubsection{Receive and Transmit}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / De
>   };
>   \end{lstlisting}
>   
> +Otherwise, use the following form:
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +struct virtio_vsock_packet_mrg_rxbuf {
> +    struct virtio_vsock_hdr_mrg_rxbuf hdr;
> +    u8 data[];
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
>   Virtqueue buffers for outgoing packets are read-only. Virtqueue buffers for
>   incoming packets are write-only.
>   
> +When transmitting packets to the device, \field{num_buffers} is not used.
> +
> +\begin{enumerate}
> +\item \field{num_buffers} indicates how many descriptors


Similarly, I think what we want here is "buffers" instead of "descriptors".

Thanks


> +  this packet is spread over (including this one).
> +  This is valid only if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is negotiated.
> +  This allows receipt of large packets without having to allocate large
> +  buffers: a packet that does not fit in a single buffer can flow
> +  over to the next buffer, and so on. In this case, there will be
> +  at least \field{num_buffers} used buffers in the virtqueue, and the device
> +  chains them together to form a single packet in a way similar to
> +  how it would store it in a single buffer spread over multiple
> +  descriptors.
> +  The other buffers will not begin with a struct virtio_vsock_hdr.
> +
> +  If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is not negotiated, then only one
> +  descriptor is used.
> +
> +\item If
> +  \field{num_buffers} is one, then the entire packet will be
> +  contained within this buffer, immediately following the struct
> +  virtio_vsock_hdr.
> +\end{enumerate}
> +
>   \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Device Operation: Receive and Transmit}{Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Receive and Transmit}
>   
>   The \field{guest_cid} configuration field MUST be used as the source CID when
> @@ -213,6 +276,19 @@ \subsubsection{Receive and Transmit}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / De
>   A VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST reply MUST be sent if a packet is received with an
>   unknown \field{type} value.
>   
> +If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF has been negotiated, the device MUST set
> +\field{num_buffers} to indicate the number of buffers
> +the packet (including the header) is spread over.
> +
> +If a receive packet is spread over multiple buffers, the device
> +MUST use all buffers but the last (i.e. the first $\field{num_buffers} -
> +1$ buffers) completely up to the full length of each buffer
> +supplied by the driver.
> +
> +The device MUST use all buffers used by a single receive
> +packet together, such that at least \field{num_buffers} are
> +observed by driver as used.
> +
>   \subsubsection{Stream Sockets}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Stream Sockets}
>   
>   Connections are established by sending a VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_REQUEST packet. If a

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization