From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Alok Kataria" <akataria@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip v2 2/2] x86/xen: Deprecate xen_nopvspin
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:28:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9039d470-c805-3d9d-c0a8-56cb3e539626@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fb79da7-4c95-160a-a626-670c536f490a@redhat.com>
On 02/11/17 14:25, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/01/2017 06:01 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 11/01/2017 04:58 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> +/* TODO: To be removed in a future kernel version */
>>> static __init int xen_parse_nopvspin(char *arg)
>>> {
>>> - xen_pvspin = false;
>>> + pr_warn("xen_nopvspin is deprecated, replace it with \"pvlock_type=queued\"!\n");
>>> + if (!pv_spinlock_type)
>>> + pv_spinlock_type = locktype_queued;
>> Since we currently end up using unfair locks and because you are
>> deprecating xen_nopvspin I wonder whether it would be better to set this
>> to locktype_unfair so that current behavior doesn't change. (Sorry, I
>> haven't responded to your earlier message before you posted this). Juergen?
>
> I think the latest patch from Juergen in tip is to use native qspinlock
> when xen_nopvspin is specified. Right? That is why I made the current
> choice. I can certainly change to unfair if it is what you guys want.
No, when we are keeping xen_nopvspin (even as deprecated) it should
behave as designed, so locktype_queued is correct.
Juergen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-02 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1509569934-4919-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
2017-11-01 20:58 ` [PATCH-tip v2 1/2] x86/paravirt: Add kernel parameter to choose paravirt lock type Waiman Long
2017-11-01 20:58 ` [PATCH-tip v2 2/2] x86/xen: Deprecate xen_nopvspin Waiman Long
[not found] ` <1509569934-4919-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
2017-11-01 22:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-11-02 13:25 ` Waiman Long
[not found] ` <2fb79da7-4c95-160a-a626-670c536f490a@redhat.com>
2017-11-02 13:28 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9039d470-c805-3d9d-c0a8-56cb3e539626@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox