public inbox for virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"eperezma@redhat.com" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	Shiva Shankar Kommula <kshankar@marvell.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux.dev" <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net-next,2/2] virtio_net: replace RSS key size max check with BUILD_BUG_ON
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 12:29:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY1PR18MB63746E0AE4CEEB32F708F1D5A075A@BY1PR18MB6374.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260225071659-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

> > > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 05:52:29PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 04:47:22 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > > <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 05:36:06PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 04:33:57 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > > <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 05:30:33PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 04:24:14 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > > <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 05:11:42PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:28:50 +0530, Srujana Challa
> > > <schalla@marvell.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Since NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN was increased to 256 in
> > > > > > > > > > > net-next, use BUILD_BUG_ON to enforce the limit at
> > > > > > > > > > > compile time and remove the redundant runtime max check.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +-------
> > > > > > > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index
> > > > > > > > > > > eeefe8abc122..768ad5523dfa 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > > > > > > @@ -6639,13 +6639,7 @@ static int
> > > > > > > > > > > virtnet_validate(struct
> > > virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > > > > > > > >  			__virtio_clear_bit(vdev,
> VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS);
> > > > > > > > > > >  			__virtio_clear_bit(vdev,
> > > VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT);
> > > > > > > > > > >  		}
> > > > > > > > > > > -		if (key_sz > NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN) {
> > > > > > > > > > > -			dev_warn(&vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > -				 "rss_max_key_size=%u
> exceeds driver
> > > limit %u, disabling RSS\n",
> > > > > > > > > > > -				 key_sz,
> NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN);
> > > > > > > > > > > -			__virtio_clear_bit(vdev,
> VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS);
> > > > > > > > > > > -			__virtio_clear_bit(vdev,
> > > VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT);
> > > > > > > > > > > -		}
> > > > > > > > > > > +		BUILD_BUG_ON(type_max(key_sz) >=
> > > NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN);
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Do we really need this check?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If I understand correctly, the intention is to cap
> > > > > > > > > > key_sz at 256. However, since key_sz is of type u8,
> > > > > > > > > > its maximum value is inherently 255, making this check
> > > > > > > > > > redundant. This is not only limited by this kernel
> > > > > > > > > > code, the virtio-net spec defines
> > > this.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That's why it's BUILD_BUG_ON. It checks it has the right type.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We never *need* BUILD_BUG_ON by definition, what this
> > > > > > > > > does is document the assumption.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Moreover, if NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN is ever reduced to a
> > > > > > > > > > value smaller than 256 in the future, this check would
> > > > > > > > > > no longer enforce
> > > the intended limit correctly.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > then it would fail build.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So, does this mean we don't need to account for the case
> > > > > > > > where NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN is 128, but the key_sz reported
> > > > > > > > by the device is
> > > 64?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN is 128 but the device reports a key_sz
> > > > > > of 64, does this violate the spec?
> > > > >
> > > > > not the value of key_sz. If type of key_sz
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > i actually do not understand the question. this is not what
> > > > > BUILD_BUG_ON checks.
> > > >
> > > > So this is the issue. Originally, the code checked whether the
> > > > value of key_sz was less than NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN. However,
> > > > switching to a type_max check means it no longer covers the scenario I
> described.
> > > > Therefore, I think this is unreasonable.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > patch 1 is unreasonable i think.
> >
> > Patch 1 is targeted for net, addressing an issue where
> > VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE is fixed at 40, which is only the minimum
> > required by the spec. This led to virtio‑net probe failures when
> > devices reported an RSS key size greater than 40. However, the driver
> > also cannot handle keys larger than NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN (previously 52)
> > due to the BUG_ON(len > sizeof(netdev_rss_key)) in netdev_rss_key_fill. To
> resolve both issues, VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE has been replaced with
> NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN.
> 
> but where would driver *get* keys larger than sizeof(netdev_rss_key), even if
> device supports more.
In virtio‑net, we rely on netdev_rss_key_fill() during virtnet_init_default_rss() to populate the RSS hash key,
which uses device supported length.
The code path is:
static void virtnet_init_default_rss(struct virtnet_info *vi)
{
        vi->rss_hdr->hash_types = cpu_to_le32(vi->rss_hash_types_supported);
        vi->rss_hash_types_saved = vi->rss_hash_types_supported;
        vi->rss_hdr->indirection_table_mask = vi->rss_indir_table_size
                                                ? cpu_to_le16(vi->rss_indir_table_size - 1) : 0;
        vi->rss_hdr->unclassified_queue = 0;

        virtnet_rss_update_by_qpairs(vi, vi->curr_queue_pairs);

        vi->rss_trailer.hash_key_length = vi->rss_key_size;

        netdev_rss_key_fill(vi->rss_hash_key_data, vi->rss_key_size);
}
> 
> 
> 
> > Patch 2 is added as per your suggestion to address following warning
> > in net-next after  NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN was increased to 256.
> > +../drivers/net/virtio_net.c:6642:14: warning: result of comparison of
> constant 256 with expression of type 'u8' (aka 'unsigned char') is always false
> [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
> > + 6642 |                 if (key_sz > NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN) {
> > +      |                     ~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +1 warning generated.
> > Sorry, I forgot the cover page.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > >
> > > which is why patchsets should have a cover letter btw so one can
> > > reply to just patch 1.
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the code makes assumptions but it documents them and not
> > > > > > > just documents them, build will fail if they are violated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > About this, I am ok.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Moreover, you should add a cover letter.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >  	}
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-25 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-24  6:58 [PATCH net,v4,1/2] virtio_net: Improve RSS key size validation and use NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN Srujana Challa
2026-02-24  6:58 ` [PATCH net-next,2/2] virtio_net: replace RSS key size max check with BUILD_BUG_ON Srujana Challa
2026-02-25  9:11   ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-25  9:24     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25  9:30       ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-25  9:33         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25  9:36           ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-25  9:47             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25  9:52               ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-25 10:01                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 10:05                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:13                   ` [EXTERNAL] " Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:18                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:29                       ` Srujana Challa [this message]
2026-02-25 12:35                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 14:50   ` David Laight
2026-02-25 14:52     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 10:03 ` [PATCH net,v4,1/2] virtio_net: Improve RSS key size validation and use NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:22   ` [EXTERNAL] " Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:24     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:34       ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:37         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:47           ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:52             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:56             ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 13:21               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 13:31                 ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 13:57                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-26 12:38                     ` Srujana Challa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY1PR18MB63746E0AE4CEEB32F708F1D5A075A@BY1PR18MB6374.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=schalla@marvell.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kshankar@marvell.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox