virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roopa Prabhu <roprabhu@cisco.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>,
	habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lguest@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Shirley Ma <xma@us.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, steved@us.ibm.com,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	linux390@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: RFT: virtio_net: limit xmit polling
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:50:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA29D629.2C9B1%roprabhu@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106211023.24643.tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1934 bytes --]

Michael,  

I am testing this too.
 I have finished one round of testing. But am running it again just to
confirm.
This time I will see if I can collect some exit stats too. Will post results
sometime this weekend.
I am just doing TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS from guest to remote host.

Thanks,
Roopa


On 6/21/11 8:23 AM, "Tom Lendacky" <tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Sunday, June 19, 2011 05:27:00 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > OK, different people seem to test different trees.  In the hope to get
>> > everyone on the same page, I created several variants of this patch so
>> > they can be compared. Whoever's interested, please check out the
>> > following, and tell me how these compare:
> 
> I'm in the process of testing these patches.  Base and v0 are complete
> and v1 is near complete with v2 to follow.  I'm testing with a variety
> of TCP_RR and TCP_STREAM/TCP_MAERTS tests involving local guest-to-guest
> tests and remote host-to-guest tests.  I'll post the results in the next
> day or two when the tests finish.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>> >
>> > kernel:
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git
>> >
>> > virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/base - this is net-next baseline to test
>> > against virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v0 - fixes checks on out of capacity
>> > virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v1 - previous revision of the patch
>> >               this does xmit,free,xmit,2*free,free
>> > virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v2 - new revision of the patch
>> >               this does free,xmit,2*free,free
>> >
>> > There's also this on top:
>> > virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v3 -> don't delay avail index update
>> > I don't think it's important to test this one, yet
>> >
>> > Userspace to use: event index work is not yet merged upstream
>> > so the revision to use is still this:
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu-kvm.git
>> > virtio-net-event-idx-v3
> 


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2700 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 184 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

       reply	other threads:[~2011-06-24 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201106211023.24643.tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2011-06-24 12:50 ` Roopa Prabhu [this message]
2011-06-25 19:44   ` RFT: virtio_net: limit xmit polling Roopa Prabhu
     [not found] <20110629084206.GA14627@redhat.com>
2011-07-07 13:24 ` Roopa Prabhu
2011-07-14 19:38 ` Roopa Prabhu
     [not found] ` <CA4493AD.2E273%roprabhu@cisco.com>
2011-07-17  9:42   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found] <20110619102700.GA11198@redhat.com>
2011-06-21 15:23 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-06-28 16:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-06-29  8:42   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-06-19 10:27 Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA29D629.2C9B1%roprabhu@cisco.com \
    --to=roprabhu@cisco.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lguest@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=steved@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xma@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).