* Re: [PATCH v2] vringh: Fix loop descriptors check in the indirect cases
[not found] <20220505100910.137-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com>
@ 2022-05-10 7:43 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <CACycT3uakPB_JeXb11hrBaPjcdqign3FmuQd3FXgFR7orO_Eaw@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-05-10 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xie Yongji; +Cc: fam.zheng, rusty, virtualization, kvm, mst
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 6:08 PM Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> We should use size of descriptor chain to test loop condition
> in the indirect case. And another statistical count is also introduced
> for indirect descriptors to avoid conflict with the statistical count
> of direct descriptors.
>
> Fixes: f87d0fbb5798 ("vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings.")
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> index 14e2043d7685..eab55accf381 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> int (*copy)(const struct vringh *vrh,
> void *dst, const void *src, size_t len))
> {
> - int err, count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
> + int err, count = 0, indirect_count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
> struct vring_desc desc, *descs;
> struct vringh_range range = { -1ULL, 0 }, slowrange;
> bool slow = false;
> @@ -349,7 +349,12 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (count++ == vrh->vring.num) {
> + if (up_next == -1)
> + count++;
> + else
> + indirect_count++;
> +
> + if (count > vrh->vring.num || indirect_count > desc_max) {
> vringh_bad("Descriptor loop in %p", descs);
> err = -ELOOP;
> goto fail;
> @@ -411,6 +416,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> i = return_from_indirect(vrh, &up_next,
> &descs, &desc_max);
> slow = false;
> + indirect_count = 0;
Do we need to reset up_next to -1 here?
Thanks
> } else
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] vringh: Fix loop descriptors check in the indirect cases
[not found] ` <CACycT3uakPB_JeXb11hrBaPjcdqign3FmuQd3FXgFR7orO_Eaw@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2022-05-10 7:56 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <CACycT3v8bo=6YHmb-F3fEjVSCsJdWSLwLy4RTz6hCW39FAZZPA@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-05-10 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yongji Xie; +Cc: fam.zheng, rusty, virtualization, kvm, mst
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:54 PM Yongji Xie <xieyongji@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:44 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 6:08 PM Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > We should use size of descriptor chain to test loop condition
> > > in the indirect case. And another statistical count is also introduced
> > > for indirect descriptors to avoid conflict with the statistical count
> > > of direct descriptors.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f87d0fbb5798 ("vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings.")
> > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > index 14e2043d7685..eab55accf381 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> > > int (*copy)(const struct vringh *vrh,
> > > void *dst, const void *src, size_t len))
> > > {
> > > - int err, count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
> > > + int err, count = 0, indirect_count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
> > > struct vring_desc desc, *descs;
> > > struct vringh_range range = { -1ULL, 0 }, slowrange;
> > > bool slow = false;
> > > @@ -349,7 +349,12 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> > > continue;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (count++ == vrh->vring.num) {
> > > + if (up_next == -1)
> > > + count++;
> > > + else
> > > + indirect_count++;
> > > +
> > > + if (count > vrh->vring.num || indirect_count > desc_max) {
> > > vringh_bad("Descriptor loop in %p", descs);
> > > err = -ELOOP;
> > > goto fail;
> > > @@ -411,6 +416,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> > > i = return_from_indirect(vrh, &up_next,
> > > &descs, &desc_max);
> > > slow = false;
> > > + indirect_count = 0;
> >
> > Do we need to reset up_next to -1 here?
> >
>
> It will be reset to -1 in return_from_indirect().
Right. Then
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Yongji
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] vringh: Fix loop descriptors check in the indirect cases
[not found] ` <CACycT3v8bo=6YHmb-F3fEjVSCsJdWSLwLy4RTz6hCW39FAZZPA@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2022-06-02 9:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-06-02 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yongji Xie; +Cc: fam.zheng, rusty, kvm, virtualization
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 12:55:50PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> Ping.
Thanks for the reminder!
Will queue for rc2, rc1 has too much stuff already.
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:56 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:54 PM Yongji Xie <xieyongji@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:44 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 6:08 PM Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > We should use size of descriptor chain to test loop condition
> > > > > in the indirect case. And another statistical count is also introduced
> > > > > for indirect descriptors to avoid conflict with the statistical count
> > > > > of direct descriptors.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: f87d0fbb5798 ("vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings.")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > > > index 14e2043d7685..eab55accf381 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> > > > > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> > > > > int (*copy)(const struct vringh *vrh,
> > > > > void *dst, const void *src, size_t len))
> > > > > {
> > > > > - int err, count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
> > > > > + int err, count = 0, indirect_count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
> > > > > struct vring_desc desc, *descs;
> > > > > struct vringh_range range = { -1ULL, 0 }, slowrange;
> > > > > bool slow = false;
> > > > > @@ -349,7 +349,12 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> > > > > continue;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (count++ == vrh->vring.num) {
> > > > > + if (up_next == -1)
> > > > > + count++;
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + indirect_count++;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (count > vrh->vring.num || indirect_count > desc_max) {
> > > > > vringh_bad("Descriptor loop in %p", descs);
> > > > > err = -ELOOP;
> > > > > goto fail;
> > > > > @@ -411,6 +416,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
> > > > > i = return_from_indirect(vrh, &up_next,
> > > > > &descs, &desc_max);
> > > > > slow = false;
> > > > > + indirect_count = 0;
> > > >
> > > > Do we need to reset up_next to -1 here?
> > > >
> > >
> > > It will be reset to -1 in return_from_indirect().
> >
> > Right. Then
> >
> > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yongji
> > >
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-02 9:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220505100910.137-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com>
2022-05-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2] vringh: Fix loop descriptors check in the indirect cases Jason Wang
[not found] ` <CACycT3uakPB_JeXb11hrBaPjcdqign3FmuQd3FXgFR7orO_Eaw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-05-10 7:56 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <CACycT3v8bo=6YHmb-F3fEjVSCsJdWSLwLy4RTz6hCW39FAZZPA@mail.gmail.com>
2022-06-02 9:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).