Linux virtualization list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: vmireyno@marvell.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2] net: virtio_net: implement exact header length guest feature
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 08:59:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/XLWlw9XJUd6jel@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230221121543-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 06:21:16PM CET, mst@redhat.com wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 03:47:41PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>> 
>> Virtio spec introduced a feature VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_HDRLEN which when
>> set implicates that the driver provides the exact size of the header.
>
>OK but I feel this is not the important point. The important points are:
>- this bit means device needs this info
>- driver also has to set this bit
>For example one might replace above with:
>
>	Virtio spec introduced a feature VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_HDRLEN which when
>	which when set implicates that device benefits from knowing the exact
>	size of the header. For compatiblity, to signal to the device that the header
>	is reliable driver also needs to set this feature.
>	Without this feature set by driver, device has to figure
>	out the header size itself.
>
>and the below is ok.
>
>> Quoting the original virtio spec:
>> "hdr_len is a hint to the device as to how much of the header needs to
>>  be kept to copy into each packet"
>> 
>> "a hint" might not be clear for the reader what does it mean, if it is
>> "maybe like that" of "exactly like that". This feature just makes it
>> crystal clear and let the device count on the hdr_len being filled up
>> by the exact length of header.
>> 
>> Also note the spec already has following note about hdr_len:
>> "Due to various bugs in implementations, this field is not useful
>>  as a guarantee of the transport header size."
>> 
>> Without this feature the device needs to parse the header in core
>> data path handling. Accurate information helps the device to eliminate
>> such header parsing and directly use the hardware accelerators
>> for GSO operation.
>> 
>> virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() fills up hdr_len to skb_headlen(skb).
>> The driver already complies to fill the correct value. Introduce the
>> feature and advertise it.
>> 
>> Note that virtio spec also includes following note for device
>> implementation:
>> "Caution should be taken by the implementation so as to prevent
>>  a malicious driver from attacking the device by setting
>>  an incorrect hdr_len."
>> 
>> There is a plan to support this feature in our emulated device.
>> A device of SolidRun offers this feature bit. They claim this feature
>> will save the device a few cycles for every GSO packet.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>
>I'm fine with patch itself. with commit log tweak:
>
>Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Okay. Will do. I will put link to the spec as well

Thanks!

>
>
>> ---
>> v1->v2:
>> - extended patch description
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c        | 6 ++++--
>>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index fb5e68ed3ec2..e85b03988733 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = {
>>  	VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO,
>>  	VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM,
>>  	VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_USO4,
>> -	VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_USO6
>> +	VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_USO6,
>> +	VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_HDRLEN
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define GUEST_OFFLOAD_GRO_HW_MASK ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) | \
>> @@ -4213,7 +4214,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
>>  	VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR, \
>>  	VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS, \
>>  	VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX, VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY, \
>> -	VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS, VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT, VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL
>> +	VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS, VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT, VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL, \
>> +	VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_HDRLEN
>>  
>>  static unsigned int features[] = {
>>  	VIRTNET_FEATURES,
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h
>> index b4062bed186a..12c1c9699935 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h
>> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
>>  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_USO6	55	/* Guest can handle USOv6 in. */
>>  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_USO	56	/* Host can handle USO in. */
>>  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT  57	/* Supports hash report */
>> +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_HDRLEN  59	/* Guest provides the exact hdr_len value. */
>>  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS	  60	/* Supports RSS RX steering */
>>  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_RSC_EXT	  61	/* extended coalescing info */
>>  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY	  62	/* Act as standby for another device
>> -- 
>> 2.39.0
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

      reply	other threads:[~2023-02-22  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-21 14:47 [patch net-next v2] net: virtio_net: implement exact header length guest feature Jiri Pirko
2023-02-21 15:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-02-21 15:39   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-02-21 16:12     ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-02-22  7:58       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-02-22 15:14         ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-02-22 16:11           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-22 17:22             ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-02-21 17:39     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-21 15:20 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2023-02-21 15:26 ` Alvaro Karsz
2023-02-21 17:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-22  7:59   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y/XLWlw9XJUd6jel@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vmireyno@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox