From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_blk: add VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME feature support
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:35:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3/VeeuG1GL5SRnJ@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121085923.2717501-1-alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10666 bytes --]
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:59:23AM +0200, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
> Implement the VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME feature for VirtIO block devices.
>
> This commit introduces a new ioctl command, VBLK_LIFETIME.
How about naming it VBLK_GET_LIFETIME? It's clearer what the ioctl does
and it follows the name of virtio-blk request type.
>
> VBLK_LIFETIME ioctl asks for the block device to provide lifetime
> information by sending a VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_LIFETIME command to the device.
>
> lifetime information fields:
>
> - pre_eol_info: specifies the percentage of reserved blocks that are
> consumed.
> optional values following virtio spec:
> *) 0 - undefined.
> *) 1 - normal, < 80% of reserved blocks are consumed.
> *) 2 - warning, 80% of reserved blocks are consumed.
> *) 3 - urgent, 90% of reserved blocks are consumed.
>
> - device_lifetime_est_typ_a: this field refers to wear of SLC cells and
> is provided in increments of 10used, and so
> on, thru to 11 meaning estimated lifetime
> exceeded. All values above 11 are reserved.
>
> - device_lifetime_est_typ_b: this field refers to wear of MLC cells and is
> provided with the same semantics as
> device_lifetime_est_typ_a.
>
> The data received from the device will be sent as is to the user.
> No data check/decode is done by virtblk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com>
> --
> v2:
> - Remove (void *) casting.
> - Fix comments format in virtio_blk.h.
> - Set ioprio value for legacy devices for REQ_OP_DRV_IN
> operations.
> --
> ---
> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h | 32 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 19da5defd73..9aa37677b65 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,18 @@ static inline blk_status_t virtblk_result(struct virtblk_req *vbr)
> }
> }
>
> +static inline int virtblk_ioctl_result(struct virtblk_req *vbr)
> +{
> + switch (vbr->status) {
> + case VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK:
> + return 0;
> + case VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP:
> + return -ENOTTY;
ENOTTY already has meaning for ioctl(2):
ENOTTY fd is not associated with a character special device.
ENOTTY The specified request does not apply to the kind of object that the file descriptor fd references.
Use ENOTSUP instead?
> + default:
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static inline struct virtio_blk_vq *get_virtio_blk_vq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> {
> struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
> @@ -218,6 +230,7 @@ static blk_status_t virtblk_setup_cmd(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> u32 type;
>
> vbr->out_hdr.sector = 0;
> + vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
>
> switch (req_op(req)) {
> case REQ_OP_READ:
> @@ -244,15 +257,14 @@ static blk_status_t virtblk_setup_cmd(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_SECURE_ERASE;
> break;
> case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
> - type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID;
> - break;
> + /* type is set in virtblk_get_id/virtblk_ioctl_lifetime */
> + return 0;
> default:
> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> }
>
> vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, type);
> - vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, req_get_ioprio(req));
>
> if (type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD || type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES ||
> type == VIRTIO_BLK_T_SECURE_ERASE) {
> @@ -459,12 +471,16 @@ static int virtblk_get_id(struct gendisk *disk, char *id_str)
> struct virtio_blk *vblk = disk->private_data;
> struct request_queue *q = vblk->disk->queue;
> struct request *req;
> + struct virtblk_req *vbr;
> int err;
>
> req = blk_mq_alloc_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(req))
> return PTR_ERR(req);
>
> + vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> + vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID);
> +
> err = blk_rq_map_kern(q, req, id_str, VIRTIO_BLK_ID_BYTES, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> @@ -508,6 +524,79 @@ static int virtblk_getgeo(struct block_device *bd, struct hd_geometry *geo)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* Get lifetime information from device */
> +static int virtblk_ioctl_lifetime(struct virtio_blk *vblk, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q = vblk->disk->queue;
> + struct request *req = NULL;
> + struct virtblk_req *vbr;
> + struct virtio_blk_lifetime lifetime;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* The virtio_blk_lifetime struct fields follow virtio spec.
> + * There is no check/decode on values received from the device.
> + * The data is sent as is to the user.
> + */
In terms of security, any process with access to the block device node
is allowed to get the lifetime?
Usually only privileged processes have access to block device nodes, but
I wanted to check whether anyone can think of a scenario where this is
not okay.
For example, a virtio-blk device may have a partition that an untrusted
process like a database or key-value store accesses. Can the untrusted
process read the lifetime information of the entire device?
> +
> + /* This ioctl is allowed only if VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME
> + * feature is negotiated.
> + */
> + if (!virtio_has_feature(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME))
> + return -ENOTTY;
> +
> + memset(&lifetime, 0, sizeof(lifetime));
> +
> + req = blk_mq_alloc_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(req))
> + return PTR_ERR(req);
> +
> + /* Write the correct type */
> + vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> + vbr->out_hdr.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vblk->vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_LIFETIME);
> +
> + ret = blk_rq_map_kern(q, req, &lifetime, sizeof(lifetime), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + blk_execute_rq(req, false);
> +
> + ret = virtblk_ioctl_result(blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req));
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* Pass the data to the user */
> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &lifetime, sizeof(lifetime))) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
It's unusual for an ioctl to produce a struct that's not in CPU
endianness. I think the kernel should deal with endianness here.
> +
> +out:
> + blk_mq_free_request(req);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtblk_ioctl(struct block_device *bd, fmode_t mode,
> + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct virtio_blk *vblk = bd->bd_disk->private_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vblk->vdev_mutex);
We need to check that vblk->vdev is non-NULL before accessing it in
virtblk_ioctl_lifetime():
if (!vblk->vdev) {
mutex_unlock(&vblk->dev_mutex);
return -ENXIO;
}
Without the check I expect virtblk_ioctl_lifetime() to dereference a
NULL pointer.
> +
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case VBLK_LIFETIME:
> + ret = virtblk_ioctl_lifetime(vblk, arg);
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -ENOTTY;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&vblk->vdev_mutex);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void virtblk_free_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> {
> struct virtio_blk *vblk = disk->private_data;
> @@ -520,6 +609,7 @@ static void virtblk_free_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> static const struct block_device_operations virtblk_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .getgeo = virtblk_getgeo,
> + .ioctl = virtblk_ioctl,
> .free_disk = virtblk_free_disk,
> };
>
> @@ -1239,7 +1329,7 @@ static unsigned int features_legacy[] = {
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE,
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD, VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROES,
> - VIRTIO_BLK_F_SECURE_ERASE,
> + VIRTIO_BLK_F_SECURE_ERASE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME,
> }
> ;
> static unsigned int features[] = {
> @@ -1247,7 +1337,7 @@ static unsigned int features[] = {
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE,
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD, VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROES,
> - VIRTIO_BLK_F_SECURE_ERASE,
> + VIRTIO_BLK_F_SECURE_ERASE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME,
> };
>
> static struct virtio_driver virtio_blk = {
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h
> index 58e70b24b50..c769930d269 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ 12 /* support more than one vq */
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD 13 /* DISCARD is supported */
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROES 14 /* WRITE ZEROES is supported */
> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME 15 /* Storage lifetime information is supported */
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_SECURE_ERASE 16 /* Secure Erase is supported */
>
> /* Legacy feature bits */
> @@ -165,6 +166,9 @@ struct virtio_blk_config {
> /* Get device ID command */
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID 8
>
> +/* Get lifetime information command */
> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_LIFETIME 10
> +
> /* Discard command */
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_T_DISCARD 11
>
> @@ -206,6 +210,30 @@ struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes {
> __le32 flags;
> };
>
> +/* Get lifetime information struct for each request */
> +struct virtio_blk_lifetime {
> + /*
> + * specifies the percentage of reserved blocks that are consumed.
> + * optional values following virtio spec:
> + * 0 - undefined
> + * 1 - normal, < 80% of reserved blocks are consumed
> + * 2 - warning, 80% of reserved blocks are consumed
> + * 3 - urgent, 90% of reserved blocks are consumed
> + */
> + __le16 pre_eol_info;
> + /*
> + * this field refers to wear of SLC cells and is provided in increments of 10used,
> + * and so on, thru to 11 meaning estimated lifetime exceeded. All values above 11
> + * are reserved
> + */
> + __le16 device_lifetime_est_typ_a;
> + /*
> + * this field refers to wear of MLC cells and is provided with the same semantics as
> + * device_lifetime_est_typ_a
> + */
> + __le16 device_lifetime_est_typ_b;
> +};
> +
> #ifndef VIRTIO_BLK_NO_LEGACY
> struct virtio_scsi_inhdr {
> __virtio32 errors;
> @@ -219,4 +247,8 @@ struct virtio_scsi_inhdr {
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK 0
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR 1
> #define VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP 2
> +
> +/* Virtblk ioctl commands */
> +#define VBLK_LIFETIME _IOR('r', 0, struct virtio_blk_lifetime)
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_BLK_H */
> --
> 2.32.0
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-24 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 8:59 [PATCH v2] virtio_blk: add VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME feature support Alvaro Karsz
[not found] ` <1bd1c77e-d8c3-b04a-4fbc-bbc85391e630@nvidia.com>
2022-11-24 6:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 20:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-24 22:02 ` Alvaro Karsz
2022-11-24 22:09 ` Alvaro Karsz
2022-11-28 19:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
[not found] ` <dc8bf007-a6f6-9824-63e1-9447335da732@nvidia.com>
2022-11-29 5:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <b76ad252-3f6a-8f4b-cb2d-0a4f45860aae@nvidia.com>
2022-12-04 8:19 ` Alvaro Karsz
2022-12-04 10:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-04 12:00 ` Alvaro Karsz
2022-12-04 12:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-04 14:37 ` Alvaro Karsz
2022-12-04 16:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <ce455ec6-353b-d273-0d52-44673f4dc0cc@nvidia.com>
2022-12-05 5:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-28 20:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <1b8d59e1-8702-8b81-f82c-a743116da799@nvidia.com>
2022-11-24 6:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 8:07 ` Alvaro Karsz
2022-11-24 20:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3/VeeuG1GL5SRnJ@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).