virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, israelr@nvidia.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org,
	nitzanc@nvidia.com, stefanha@redhat.com, oren@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: set NUMA affinity for a tagset
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:23:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVIMIFxjRcfDDub4@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c155679-e1db-3d1e-2b4e-a0f12ce5950c@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 08:25:09PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> On 9/27/2021 2:34 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 05:55:18PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > To optimize performance, set the affinity of the block device tagset
> > > according to the virtio device affinity.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > index 9b3bd083b411..1c68c3e0ebf9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > >   	memset(&vblk->tag_set, 0, sizeof(vblk->tag_set));
> > >   	vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops;
> > >   	vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = queue_depth;
> > > -	vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> > > +	vblk->tag_set.numa_node = virtio_dev_to_node(vdev);
> > I afraid that by doing it, you will increase chances to see OOM, because
> > in NUMA_NO_NODE, MM will try allocate memory in whole system, while in
> > the latter mode only on specific NUMA which can be depleted.
> 
> This is a common methodology we use in the block layer and in NVMe subsystem
> and we don't afraid of the OOM issue you raised.

There are many reasons for that, but we are talking about virtio here
and not about NVMe.

> 
> This is not new and I guess that the kernel MM will (or should) be handling
> the fallback you raised.

I afraid that it is not. Can you point me to the place where such
fallback is implemented?

> 
> Anyway, if we're doing this in NVMe I don't see a reason to afraid doing it
> in virtio-blk.

Still, it is nice to have some empirical data to support this copy/paste.

There are too many myths related to optimizations, so finally it will be
good to get some supportive data.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-27 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210926145518.64164-1-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
2021-09-27  8:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio: introduce virtio_dev_to_node helper Stefan Hajnoczi
     [not found] ` <20210926145518.64164-2-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
2021-09-27  8:09   ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: set NUMA affinity for a tagset Stefan Hajnoczi
     [not found]     ` <21295187-41c4-5fb6-21c3-28004eb7c5d8@nvidia.com>
2021-09-28  6:47       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
     [not found]         ` <f15e1115-25c1-5b9a-223c-db122251d4c1@nvidia.com>
2021-09-30 13:16           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-09-27 11:34   ` Leon Romanovsky
     [not found]     ` <0c155679-e1db-3d1e-2b4e-a0f12ce5950c@nvidia.com>
2021-09-27 18:23       ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
     [not found]         ` <f8de7c19-9f04-a458-6c1d-8133a83aa93f@nvidia.com>
2021-09-28 16:27           ` Leon Romanovsky
     [not found]             ` <f0cc8cb4-92dc-f5f9-ea50-aa312ac6a056@nvidia.com>
2021-09-29  6:50               ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-27  9:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio: introduce virtio_dev_to_node helper Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVIMIFxjRcfDDub4@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nitzanc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).