virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:56:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4pFgIqB50gz-ODi@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250117074442.256705-2-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 08:44:07AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> File systems can and often do allocate memory in the read-write path.
> If these allocations are done with __GFP_IO or __GFP_FS set they can
> recurse into the file system or swap device on top of the loop device
> and cause deadlocks.  Prevent this by forcing a noio scope over the
> calls into the file system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/block/loop.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 1ec7417c7f00..71eccc5cfffb 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1905,6 +1905,15 @@ static void loop_handle_cmd(struct loop_cmd *cmd)
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *old_memcg = NULL;
>  	const bool use_aio = cmd->use_aio;
> +	unsigned int memflags;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We're calling into file system which could do be doing memory
> +	 * allocations.  Ensure the memory reclaim does not cause I/O,
> +	 * because that could end up in the user of this loop devices again and
> +	 * deadlock.
> +	 */
> +	memflags = memalloc_noio_save();

If we call memalloc_noio_save() here, setting PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO can be removed
from loop_process_work().


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-17 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-17  7:44 annotate noio context Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17  7:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 11:56   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-01-22  6:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17  7:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: force noio scope in blk_mq_freeze_queue Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z4pFgIqB50gz-ODi@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).