From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:56:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4pFgIqB50gz-ODi@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250117074442.256705-2-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 08:44:07AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> File systems can and often do allocate memory in the read-write path.
> If these allocations are done with __GFP_IO or __GFP_FS set they can
> recurse into the file system or swap device on top of the loop device
> and cause deadlocks. Prevent this by forcing a noio scope over the
> calls into the file system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 1ec7417c7f00..71eccc5cfffb 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1905,6 +1905,15 @@ static void loop_handle_cmd(struct loop_cmd *cmd)
> int ret = 0;
> struct mem_cgroup *old_memcg = NULL;
> const bool use_aio = cmd->use_aio;
> + unsigned int memflags;
> +
> + /*
> + * We're calling into file system which could do be doing memory
> + * allocations. Ensure the memory reclaim does not cause I/O,
> + * because that could end up in the user of this loop devices again and
> + * deadlock.
> + */
> + memflags = memalloc_noio_save();
If we call memalloc_noio_save() here, setting PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO can be removed
from loop_process_work().
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 7:44 annotate noio context Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 7:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 11:56 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-01-22 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 7:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: force noio scope in blk_mq_freeze_queue Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4pFgIqB50gz-ODi@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).