From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, stevensd@chromium.org
Subject: Re: ACPI timeouts when enabling KASAN
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:38:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh_e_t7TBUdYdtyc@gpd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417145544.38d7b482@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:55:44PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:07:08 +0200
> Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 01:36:40PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > Hi Igor
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 13:33, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:18:22 +0200
> > > > Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Igor, Hi Rafael
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, it seems that it is just KASAN being extremely slow.
> > > > > From a completely newbie here... Is there a reason why qemu generates
> > > > > the table vs returning a precomputed one?
> > > >
> > > > it can be a pre-generated Package
> > > > like we do with ARM (example: acpi_dsdt_add_pci_route_table)
> > > >
> > > > > This is the config file:
> > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/media-ci/-/blob/main/testdata/virtme/virtme.config?ref_type=heads
> > > > >
> > > > > And this is the qemu cli:
> > > > >
> > > > > /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4G -fsdev
> > > > > local,id=virtfs3,path=/,security_model=none,readonly=on,multidevs=remap
> > > > > -device virtio-9p-pci,fsdev=virtfs3,mount_tag=/dev/root -device
> > > > > i6300esb,id=watchdog0 -parallel none -net none -smp 2 -vga none
> > > > > -display none -serial chardev:console -chardev
> > > > > file,id=console,path=/proc/self/fd/2 -chardev
> > > > > stdio,id=stdin,signal=on,mux=off -device virtio-serial-pci -device
> > > > > virtserialport,name=virtme.stdin,chardev=stdin -chardev
> > > > > file,id=stdout,path=/proc/self/fd/1 -device virtio-serial-pci -device
> > > > > virtserialport,name=virtme.stdout,chardev=stdout -chardev
> > > > > file,id=stderr,path=/proc/self/fd/2 -device virtio-serial-pci -device
> > > > > virtserialport,name=virtme.stderr,chardev=stderr -chardev
> > > > > file,id=dev_stdout,path=/proc/self/fd/1 -device virtio-serial-pci
> > > > > -device virtserialport,name=virtme.dev_stdout,chardev=dev_stdout
> > > > > -chardev file,id=dev_stderr,path=/proc/self/fd/2 -device
> > > > > virtio-serial-pci -device
> > > > > virtserialport,name=virtme.dev_stderr,chardev=dev_stderr -chardev
> > > > > file,id=ret,path=/tmp/virtme_retefeobj4f -device virtio-serial-pci
> > > > > -device virtserialport,name=virtme.ret,chardev=ret -no-reboot -kernel
> > > > > ./arch/x86/boot/bzImage -append 'nr_open=1048576
> > > > > virtme_link_mods=/builds/linux-media/media-staging/.virtme_mods/lib/modules/0.0.0
> > > > > console=ttyS0 earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200 panic=-1
> > > > > virtme.exec=`c2ggL21lZGlhLWNpL3Rlc3RkYXRhL3ZpcnRtZS90ZXN0LnNoIC9tZWRpYS1jaS90aGlyZF9wYXJ0eS92NGwtdXRpbHMgLTMy`
> > > > > virtme_root_user=1 rootfstype=9p
> > > > > rootflags=version=9p2000.L,trans=virtio,access=any raid=noautodetect
> > > > > ro init=/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/virtme/guest/virtme-init'
> > > >
> > > > boots fine for me on old Xeon E5-2630v3.
> > > > Perhaps issue is that your host is too slow,
> > > > is there reason not to use KVM instead of TCG?
> > >
> > > I am using a e2 instance that does not support nested virtualization :(
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Alternatively you can try using q35 machine type
> > > > instead of default 'pc', it doesn't have _PRT in
> > > > simple configuration like yours.
> > > > But then running things that depend on time is not
> > > > reliable under TCG, so you might hit timeout elsewhere.
> > >
> > > I will give it a try... but you are correct, if this is running this
> > > slow I expect that nothing from my CI will work reliably.
> >
> > I'm really interested to see if q35 helps here. If that's the case maybe
> > we should default to q35 in virtme-ng when KVM isn't available (even if
> > on my box q35 is actually slower than the default pc, so in that case we
> > may need to come up with some logic to pick the right machine type).
>
> it might be interesting to find out why q35 is slower (it shouldn't be)
Nevermind, I was comparing native kvm vs q35, of course it was slower...
> With above config one can put all devices on hostbridge as integrated endpoints
> which roughly will be the same as PCI topo in 'pc' machine)
>
> another thing that might help is adding '-cpu max' instead of default
> qemu64 cpu model.
Doing the proper comparison (disabling kvm), adding '-cpu max' to the
equation and measuring the boot time of multiple virtme-ng runs, gives
me the following result (average of 10 runs):
machine
+----------------
| default q35
---------+----------------
cpu |default | 13s 11s
|max | 15s 14s
I've tried a couple of kernel configs and I get similar results.
In the scope of virtme-ng (optimize boot time) I'd say that it'd makes
sense to use '-machine q35' and default cpu settings when kvm is
unavailable.
Ricardo, do you see similar results?
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 21:43 ACPI timeouts when enabling KASAN Ricardo Ribalda
2024-04-13 5:56 ` Andrea Righi
2024-04-13 7:39 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-04-14 8:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-04-15 12:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2024-04-15 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 14:18 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-04-15 14:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 14:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-04-16 11:33 ` Igor Mammedov
2024-04-16 11:36 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-04-16 12:07 ` Andrea Righi
2024-04-17 12:13 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-04-17 12:52 ` Andrea Righi
2024-04-17 12:55 ` Igor Mammedov
2024-04-17 14:38 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2024-04-17 16:12 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2024-04-17 19:38 ` Andrea Righi
2024-05-03 8:41 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh_e_t7TBUdYdtyc@gpd \
--to=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ribalda@google.com \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).