public inbox for virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Keir Fraser" <keirf@google.com>,
	"Steven Moreland" <smoreland@google.com>,
	"Frederick Mayle" <fmayle@google.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:50:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGKII2RcxMpBY3Zc@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <izmrcafyog7cxvef2nipk5f2vzxxptyc4fopnvl3heqslsp7q6@32ssw2piag6h>

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:51:45PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 02:15:38PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > We're using vsock extensively in Android as a channel over which we can
> > route binder transactions to/from virtual machines managed by the
> > Android Virtualisation Framework. However, we have been observing some
> > issues in production builds when using vsock in a low-memory environment
> > (on the host and the guest) such as:
> > 
> >  * The host receive path hanging forever, despite the guest performing
> >    a successful write to the socket.
> > 
> >  * Page allocation failures in the vhost receive path (this is a likely
> >    contributor to the above)
> > 
> >  * -ENOMEM coming back from sendmsg()
> > 
> > This series aims to improve the vsock SKB allocation for both the host
> > (vhost) and the guest when using the virtio transport to help mitigate
> > these issues. Specifically:
> > 
> >  - Avoid single allocations of order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
> > 
> >  - Use non-linear SKBs for the transmit and vhost receive paths
> > 
> >  - Reduce the guest RX buffers to a single page
> > 
> > There are more details in the individual commit messages but overall
> > this results in less wasted memory and puts less pressure on the
> > allocator.
> > 
> > This is my first time looking at this stuff, so all feedback is welcome.
> 
> Thank you very much for this series!
> 
> I left some minor comments, but overall LGTM!

Cheers for going through it! I'll work through your comments now...

Will

      reply	other threads:[~2025-06-30 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25 13:15 [PATCH 0/5] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Will Deacon
2025-06-25 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] vhost/vsock: Avoid allocating arbitrarily-sized SKBs Will Deacon
2025-06-27 10:36   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-06-30 12:51     ` Will Deacon
2025-07-01 10:37       ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-06-25 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] vsock/virtio: Resize receive buffers so that each SKB fits in a page Will Deacon
2025-06-27 10:41   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-06-30 13:06     ` Will Deacon
2025-06-25 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] vhost/vsock: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large receive buffers Will Deacon
2025-06-27 10:45   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-06-30 14:20     ` Will Deacon
2025-07-01 10:44       ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-01 13:52         ` Will Deacon
2025-06-25 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] vsock/virtio: Rename virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() to virtio_vsock_skb_put() Will Deacon
2025-06-27 10:46   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-06-25 13:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] vhost/vsock: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large transmit buffers Will Deacon
2025-06-27 10:50   ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-06-30 14:21     ` Will Deacon
2025-06-27 10:51 ` [PATCH 0/5] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Stefano Garzarella
2025-06-30 12:50   ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aGKII2RcxMpBY3Zc@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=fmayle@google.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=keirf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=smoreland@google.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox