virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] selftests/vsock: avoid multi-VM pidfile collisions with QEMU
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 15:08:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQ4LaUi9wTnEN8KA@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v3-4-519372e8a07b@meta.com>

On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 04:49:48PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:

...

> @@ -90,15 +85,19 @@ vm_ssh() {
>  }
>  
>  cleanup() {
> -	if [[ -s "${QEMU_PIDFILE}" ]]; then
> -		pkill -SIGTERM -F "${QEMU_PIDFILE}" > /dev/null 2>&1
> -	fi
> +	local pidfile
>  
> -	# If failure occurred during or before qemu start up, then we need
> -	# to clean this up ourselves.
> -	if [[ -e "${QEMU_PIDFILE}" ]]; then
> -		rm "${QEMU_PIDFILE}"
> -	fi
> +	for pidfile in "${PIDFILES[@]}"; do
> +		if [[ -s "${pidfile}" ]]; then
> +			pkill -SIGTERM -F "${pidfile}" > /dev/null 2>&1
> +		fi
> +
> +		# If failure occurred during or before qemu start up, then we need
> +		# to clean this up ourselves.
> +		if [[ -e "${pidfile}" ]]; then
> +			rm "${pidfile}"
> +		fi
> +	done
>  }

Hi Bobby,

This is completely untested, but it looks to me
like cleanup() could be implemented more succinctly like this.

cleanup() {
	terminate_pidfiles "${PIDFILES[@]}"
}

>  
>  check_args() {
> @@ -188,10 +187,35 @@ handle_build() {
>  	popd &>/dev/null
>  }
>  
> +create_pidfile() {
> +	local pidfile
> +
> +	pidfile=$(mktemp "${PIDFILE_TEMPLATE}")
> +	PIDFILES+=("${pidfile}")
> +
> +	echo "${pidfile}"
> +}
> +
> +terminate_pidfiles() {
> +	local pidfile
> +
> +	for pidfile in "$@"; do
> +		if [[ -s "${pidfile}" ]]; then
> +			pkill -SIGTERM -F "${pidfile}" > /dev/null 2>&1
> +		fi
> +
> +		if [[ -e "${pidfile}" ]]; then
> +			rm -f "${pidfile}"
> +		fi
> +	done

I think it would be useful to remove $pidfile from $PIDFILES.
This might be easier to implement if PIDFILES was an associative array.

> +}
> +

...

> @@ -498,7 +529,8 @@ handle_build
>  echo "1..${#ARGS[@]}"
>  
>  log_host "Booting up VM"
> -vm_start
> +pidfile="$(create_pidfile)"
> +vm_start "${pidfile}"
>  vm_wait_for_ssh
>  log_host "VM booted up"
>  

> @@ -522,6 +554,8 @@ for arg in "${ARGS[@]}"; do
>  	cnt_total=$(( cnt_total + 1 ))
>  done
>  
> +terminate_pidfiles "${pidfile}"

I am assuming that there will be more calls to terminate_pidfiles
in subsequent patch-sets.

Else I think terminate_pidfiles can be removed
and instead we can rely on cleanup().

> +
>  echo "SUMMARY: PASS=${cnt_pass} SKIP=${cnt_skip} FAIL=${cnt_fail}"
>  echo "Log: ${LOG}"
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07  0:49 [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests/vsock: refactor and improve vmtest infrastructure Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/11] selftests/vsock: improve logging in vmtest.sh Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/11] selftests/vsock: make wait_for_listener() work even if pipefail is on Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/11] selftests/vsock: reuse logic for vsock_test through wrapper functions Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] selftests/vsock: avoid multi-VM pidfile collisions with QEMU Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07 15:08   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-11-07 15:35     ` Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/11] selftests/vsock: do not unconditionally die if qemu fails Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/11] selftests/vsock: speed up tests by reducing the QEMU pidfile timeout Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/11] selftests/vsock: add check_result() for pass/fail counting Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-11 11:52   ` Simon Horman
2025-11-11 21:01     ` Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/11] selftests/vsock: add BUILD=0 definition Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/11] selftests/vsock: add 1.37 to tested virtme-ng versions Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/11] selftests/vsock: add vsock_loopback module loading Bobby Eshleman
2025-11-07  0:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 11/11] selftests/vsock: disable shellcheck SC2317 and SC2119 Bobby Eshleman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQ4LaUi9wTnEN8KA@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
    --cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).