From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7613D1CD0 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2026 11:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767871819; cv=none; b=tx0svUV/QiZBJUbUJuAgGfx4nCCNA166nBCRv8LCsgEYxddw1PYUFWeRtEYdys4I8t2yWJAjvoD6YUti76nhjM61tTnpiSpOHJq+wjiLd7ymEqn9rkLX9iRKCGuaDY1mtxD3tZPSTcQKoFd7ohmji6qFIDTnNK7/snD0+7tTCIE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767871819; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Pa9x4JglsrY6GFCnO9O1vnPBicor/gXV2BFxa9ZW0QM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=AddjqZChGMYNlwC2EsGNKj7uRqMUk5yym47b1a9t8+h/V7QmIxVbaD2p1duxvQHty6qJFHvqah3ZW24W6qN7gU8kz4iy/bfVf55b68zsM2CoxJTxlWT3+C5m7beHEyg6EKDrgyXvrLj9i5ED0SKeqN8cXeUyuj3cRR8Ai90fSAY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=DPCTZvdo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DPCTZvdo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1767871813; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pa9x4JglsrY6GFCnO9O1vnPBicor/gXV2BFxa9ZW0QM=; b=DPCTZvdov3DqYirgNUUY3VESECkPjIALLG3eKSxGPr70RDzc3dmSEYpGnQ5Qat763in9AA nMHOu9QR4ZLPXbZCSNPXd0V7ZFvKeqAA5fsiG7uxYn9J05LcfZKFzNoZ9meBh2O39eh5LC vUpQlhKeWnE2RRQmiEBkwWqjFLPKrIA= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-665-Ui1v3VweObqRLct-sin90Q-1; Thu, 08 Jan 2026 06:30:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Ui1v3VweObqRLct-sin90Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Ui1v3VweObqRLct-sin90Q_1767871811 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d4029340aso29955025e9.3 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2026 03:30:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1767871811; x=1768476611; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Pa9x4JglsrY6GFCnO9O1vnPBicor/gXV2BFxa9ZW0QM=; b=IjLTzBQI7Zy91sSceiuZxkxGRPaXSVfTjCbDXONNNqqd3eeJUV+zPy8dGNHnT7jitK sVKIBjTnzq8hrbZ/XzWMilKM3mOSzK83RVy6sffI2cyj99QfvqLZq+AOoNgv8NT4mC/p iEaoPSC4/+ikkwLEgr85waOCee+V3vVFS3jvpeIQgXjWGFUJynaZCxbVa8ikamuc0flk 9KPKS+fcKUZbjPAA75XLG6/dAGxRPqz78Abr0JYTEAsT6lZ+vs5yi7IT+KWoY+iewx09 aLSHMn+kX7qP+Kk8sm4kM/tAL9+O4WICKVA1yjZR62XQA3msYqGHTM67PDM/ICIiv4Zh FqVw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVg8uOSRh8hjyZ9rnBh/6D/42gEXBOnLfDJ4lY/nBnES/OEts+/BHtzAQVs4j4xZprdQDO4bjx07UeJ7LZBEg==@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwUiu7U81lfp76ldQ7bT7XHiq0wUjiHUoZMHPjZa7QdC9VOuxb6 Re5vY4sVPpxMfBL0hXvY3Pxjn86v//ttwwOm+Zyakvf+fxZX8IkWOMU1uxLC/2p3nsS2kf9Am07 IUYO66CqCeJkd8eyq9k2LybRe4iiObrTCLx35ocwsft/gjJ5eBG07g4pCxqTpKXUBvegL X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX6H1mDoJ80tL8jjDA+gttBlddVl11XYbMi5KoDazbtbGDGHxobInyeR16Gs9Px my8YZ3e4eiDegReP6PKs3CiJTfuFVCLKgC6bGTrNSA9LEjs4yNqLVODfytdBoQJAfAyUrV5NQ5c zz4dmPahGILhjtzkZrFEBxlEbzjtmfQvaCxdOZcv7cLylAGvEBJLNqAmKQaDO/pwIBfVttYg/XG +ODZm/Taz7bi2tOAugFebue6EzZDSECTq7ICGzonaOrAANOxjiVW+6g/mDZP+xRah4Or7CasZhv ZxSQ0eJh9z2ej0ibLmlwQwIVt7+5AxRiNMclGB1W8fRpvLDRb87gvgpeK28RoZop8+sziXcfnlY lJJPlvYYBJTH/4xX9 X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c4a8:b0:477:54cd:2030 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d84b32788mr68555235e9.21.1767871811245; Thu, 08 Jan 2026 03:30:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG8+bmvV/WNN6KWlnzqQVw+P6bUXizWXcjIaBg1pO0qOtQk1LqtVJ34EAenyZ8H+/3EN9Zvfw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c4a8:b0:477:54cd:2030 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d84b32788mr68554925e9.21.1767871810799; Thu, 08 Jan 2026 03:30:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from sgarzare-redhat ([193.207.178.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-432bd5ff1e9sm16625689f8f.41.2026.01.08.03.30.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Jan 2026 03:30:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:29:58 +0100 From: Stefano Garzarella To: Paolo Abeni Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vsock/test: add a final full barrier after run all tests Message-ID: References: <20251223162210.43976-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> <9bde9e8e-3ae2-4199-b416-ae3fdaf090f5@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9bde9e8e-3ae2-4199-b416-ae3fdaf090f5@redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: gvcw1kAma1AUlgDvd-j39OGFxaNRZ8RYAmtM0g8Piqs_1767871811 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 12:08:44PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: >On 12/23/25 5:22 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> From: Stefano Garzarella >> >> If the last test fails, the other side still completes correctly, >> which could lead to false positives. >> >> Let's add a final barrier that ensures that the last test has finished >> correctly on both sides, but also that the two sides agree on the >> number of tests to be performed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella > >Net-next is currently closed; still this looks material suitable for >'net', with a proper Fixes tag. > >Please repost for net if you agree. Sure, I'll repost for `net`. Thanks, Stefano