From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 3/3] vsock: document write-once behavior of the child_ns_mode sysctl
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:06:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZc07N4BFw0hhnoZ@devvm11784.nha0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZbN8fXtCkhItSV8@sgarzare-redhat>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 11:36:40AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 10:10:38AM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
> >
> > Update the vsock child_ns_mode documentation to include the new the
>
> nit: s/the new the/the new
>
> > write-once semantics of setting child_ns_mode. The semantics are
> > implemented in a different patch in this series.
>
> s/different/preceding ?
>
> IMO this can be squashed with the previous patch, but not sure netdev policy
> about that. Not a strong opinion, it's fine also in this way.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst | 10 +++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst
> > index c10530624f1e..976a176fb451 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst
> > @@ -581,9 +581,9 @@ The init_net mode is always ``global``.
> > child_ns_mode
> > -------------
> >
> > -Controls what mode newly created child namespaces will inherit. At namespace
> > -creation, ``ns_mode`` is inherited from the parent's ``child_ns_mode``. The
> > -initial value matches the namespace's own ``ns_mode``.
> > +Write-once. Controls what mode newly created child namespaces will inherit. At
> > +namespace creation, ``ns_mode`` is inherited from the parent's
> > +``child_ns_mode``. The initial value matches the namespace's own ``ns_mode``.
> >
> > Values:
> >
> > @@ -594,6 +594,10 @@ Values:
> > their sockets will only be able to connect within their own
> > namespace.
> >
> > +``child_ns_mode`` can only be written once per namespace. Writing the same
> > +value that is already set succeeds. Writing a different value after the first
> > +write returns ``-EBUSY``.
>
> nit: instead of saying that it can only be written once, we could say that
> the first write locks the value, to be closer to the actual behavior,
> something like this:
>
> The first write to ``child_ns_mode`` locks its value. Subsequent
> writes of the same value succeed, but writing a different value
> returns ``-EBUSY``.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
Sounds good! I agree that is more clear. I'll also remove the change
above that adds "Write-once" at the beginning of the paragraph, since
this clause does a better job explaining how it actually works.
>
> > +
> > Changing ``child_ns_mode`` only affects namespaces created after the change;
> > it does not modify the current namespace or any existing children.
> >
> >
> > --
> > 2.47.3
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-18 18:10 [PATCH net v2 0/3] vsock: add write-once semantics to child_ns_mode Bobby Eshleman
2026-02-18 18:10 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] selftests/vsock: change tests to respect write-once child ns mode Bobby Eshleman
2026-02-19 10:35 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-02-18 18:10 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] vsock: lock down child_ns_mode as write-once Bobby Eshleman
2026-02-19 10:35 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-02-19 16:20 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-02-19 16:36 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-02-18 18:10 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] vsock: document write-once behavior of the child_ns_mode sysctl Bobby Eshleman
2026-02-19 10:36 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-02-19 16:06 ` Bobby Eshleman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZc07N4BFw0hhnoZ@devvm11784.nha0.facebook.com \
--to=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox