From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (mail-wm1-f42.google.com [209.85.128.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90AF63148DD for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781110638; cv=none; b=N/41xw6wd7H+g8/TN2jgLj0eBqqV+zKtFG1XEL4N6SKdr50aC65dMiqxscfgErrEWWGTDYbKp+8jfLHaEDqpMngK0GqiSpKi7s3obbLeQlt/U4+QG1TMf9iZ0BWJTbOutBi7CS4+kKzwtBKdTqrE8FkGnSjSsj2i2FR4cXNnBbc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781110638; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZKc/9gHD6AG7EiLzZfBoaV//voVPGhzjPMsLXJoxjhg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KKYEJrWn4WLfF7E430MigAAisv40eNToJN3Wh9mMLtt11J+i5+qFZg85MqO/AodwbtBIiEPkPuFzYWLzeTnBWliFMIgc/wjNK5aaTf39Tp54tZjiJRD0Pv1d8inpfmLT/Pf5q6mB0qHyFOhjoP9w6ZVG9pv9/AplyaGBB1rdLfI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre.com header.i=@baylibre.com header.b=J3dlYdkr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre.com header.i=@baylibre.com header.b="J3dlYdkr" Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490b43e2b95so58086175e9.0 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:57:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre.com; s=google; t=1781110636; x=1781715436; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZKc/9gHD6AG7EiLzZfBoaV//voVPGhzjPMsLXJoxjhg=; b=J3dlYdkrsfpb3v+uepi/MPaw8o8iaOCZdG2n5D3wSqjc7OTXgsF2CkyumUEkaiAnAq cSaNRDTL+Vxhm74GybSt2OJGQBEz6TRczSF5pU7iCtK2qhbvr11SK53sqE0UpBit4ZK4 DN/xEi7z5NQeW5PiWJigJbQR+wWbJsjNNSk7M3rAaIUDYUQQquhwnKgvJk6j52KrLh8X BI3kaFNC5RY73C9izg3z5ed4sRXjRp6GZs1igxjW/NRmy6Octih353ZO3nAVASX8bTtH llv3smUdIjNDdsHZF0uHUhuoXWXgrKD8heDjr/am4PocqVAVAt0HpfacOSGmNcqRCB0j fUPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781110636; x=1781715436; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZKc/9gHD6AG7EiLzZfBoaV//voVPGhzjPMsLXJoxjhg=; b=PvgntLjhpqqNRalyE2YDvaJTKjrClpAadli/5r13ocG4hRtsYphL0HcpnSgZyoXJOd f6Ey5KFApr5CvjtYM5kCp+KOoYmbnXGp3Q5JUY6uGJciENSmXI0ijsFLgeET+4L3NDP6 ra7b+t9PA1AavifbLYIIQnNPLPeto5SKPvCnw7zHIlgIP1Ptdxa0Oab/M9FXFT79aS3c loQOFoZ+OJk22I95HcibVoW8ysCuzRv3w2ccfLrCoBroNWK/+zgBXayjTl+iVbeyd0Ue zAjWzBjWm8LDltIPt6B1GLae1MvEYnuNWk2pYrcNx7FilnIy5Y7gr2LSJ5+uktRegXZ0 WkXg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9LEkRQkdEWMOioVIA9oXnCyEgqsu6W0IaW5OdghV0JS+jLmVDLysfQADL2PLwWAWJas+8ziZozHCy1vF7ANg==@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy1BB8cpiKtmIbtS77rctz+0gWpCILtPR349z67CkqmsvTuiyjW R2W95NsxjgbwqYO+cWLs6ZAYxdHn4GKSDjVZ+V3zFhEajgQJFtWXBD78rq8sxrUzsPg= X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OHldbuT7GBckqx03f+Ki2EuTqHCChpQBwX0dPs/FzBqdVVH7L/7EJJ4D0akfWu Ol/OrWOMQPkWOfGQ5iuyWfqJRDGgZesaux1wSltz7wSJxl8Zch6h1WYck4TBcq7iMHU+v8ph5mE n6mZQawk+6W3YD60rz4/Wfk4ivAbHX01Xkr5zIkqsCa331MRBe5uxpP7d7iWbRNtDqI6oiDEXeq quMaL3j5FdPHw4F4jvx318tRBgfSXakROtBQQzt2Op/hQ+aSkpioX0OsWozCT9oQcM4NDH6fv42 rIG1cm0TlAhAMFdfg5IJ+FpKd7mqy9uiQydU8gtvVX5KPhf99k/4eOMrsSStk2Z/mqACOFn9rWs tJUjsTFn42xk7uFWk1NniM7U1Vd6Ra0TMrucjZG9E/byXHnWDuaMfBfmRl/3oXfnurg/x/+YrvH 5CCZwXCOAIKhE/Y45yo9oAnmS7m2SEVIFOKfbi3YQLheZNmAmE6kSWb4SntDIIXSXr8B0I+4dhC kJu2IP6Ei33IORhkvitsiMYRA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5246:b0:489:c57:7836 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490c25ff39amr412376905e9.27.1781110636075; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (p200300f65f47db046aec8c3a4b621e71.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:f6:5f47:db04:6aec:8c3a:4b62:1e71]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-490e2b2353bsm472115e9.10.2026.06.10.09.57.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:57:13 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29?= To: Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Markus Schneider-Pargmann , Patrik Jakobsson , Jianmin Lv , Qianhai Wu , Huacai Chen , Mingcong Bai , Xi Ruoyao , Icenowy Zheng , Dave Airlie , Jocelyn Falempe , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers Message-ID: References: <20260504150537.2136760-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2s72lnhithaooffd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260504150537.2136760-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> --2s72lnhithaooffd Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers MIME-Version: 1.0 On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 05:05:37PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (The Capable H= ub) wrote: > The .driver_data member of the various struct pci_device_id arrays were > initialized by list expressions. This isn't easily readable if you're > not into PCI. Using the PCI_DEVICE macro and named initializers is more > explicit and thus easier to parse. Also skip explicit assignments of 0 > (which the compiler then takes care of). >=20 > This change doesn't introduce changes to the compiled pci_device_id > arrays. Tested on x86 and arm64. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (The Capable Hub) Does someone feel responsible to pick up this patch? (Or give review feedback?) Best regards Uwe --2s72lnhithaooffd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmopl2YACgkQj4D7WH0S /k7mfwf/cI81prOW+yctb6KBDLo0GNXT+8e6M1DzvwtBjMUFyQkiO9E69Nj0fVip jdfsHsFCbqoY9j/mPFG3LTQ/einC1A6UCiUftmuS+yd1RZkrobVsEGZNnvFD9EfB U3IcQdTSV5Ek1pK6SGLhe5559INii1x4VFGtwBGm2kNEcpRkVlorH9KVXQMIYEAP 2NfPETMFdSDMvpILe/YuOu4fwjYSktGk84F8d51PLhuB93+n670Iq4004AYFBR7C lnUZ9g8BaXK8Y4B/PmAn48Fom3SQaDu1lgYg/IKLel2s4z0poNpBipOjcqTNrw/t 52NdBnb1zyPcgvcMAhVzvDfkV9xHDA== =3wRg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2s72lnhithaooffd--