Re: [RFC PATCH V2 2/5] vhost: fine grain userspace memory accessors

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On 2019/3/6 下午6:45, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mar 2019, at 08:18, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is used to hide the metadata address from virtqueue helpers. This
>> will allow to implement a vmap based fast accessing to metadata.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> index 400aa78..29709e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> @@ -869,6 +869,34 @@ static inline void __user *__vhost_get_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> 	ret; \
>> })
>>
>> +static inline int vhost_put_avail_event(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_put_user(vq, cpu_to_vhost16(vq, vq->avail_idx),
>> +			      vhost_avail_event(vq));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_put_used(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> +				 struct vring_used_elem *head, int idx,
>> +				 int count)
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_copy_to_user(vq, vq->used->ring + idx, head,
>> +				  count * sizeof(*head));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_put_used_flags(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> +
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_put_user(vq, cpu_to_vhost16(vq, vq->used_flags),
>> +			      &vq->used->flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_put_used_idx(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> +
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_put_user(vq, cpu_to_vhost16(vq, vq->last_used_idx),
>> +			      &vq->used->idx);
>> +}
>> +
>> #define vhost_get_user(vq, x, ptr, type)		\
>> ({ \
>> 	int ret; \
>> @@ -907,6 +935,43 @@ static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
>> 		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int vhost_get_avail_idx(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> +				      __virtio16 *idx)
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_get_avail(vq, *idx, &vq->avail->idx);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_get_avail_head(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> +				       __virtio16 *head, int idx)
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_get_avail(vq, *head,
>> +			       &vq->avail->ring[idx & (vq->num - 1)]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_get_avail_flags(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> +					__virtio16 *flags)
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_get_avail(vq, *flags, &vq->avail->flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_get_used_event(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> +				       __virtio16 *event)
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_get_avail(vq, *event, vhost_used_event(vq));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_get_used_idx(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> +				     __virtio16 *idx)
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_get_used(vq, *idx, &vq->used->idx);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_get_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> +				 struct vring_desc *desc, int idx)
>> +{
>> +	return vhost_copy_from_user(vq, desc, vq->desc + idx, sizeof(*desc));
>> +}
>> +
>> static int vhost_new_umem_range(struct vhost_umem *umem,
>> 				u64 start, u64 size, u64 end,
>> 				u64 userspace_addr, int perm)
>> @@ -1840,8 +1905,7 @@ int vhost_log_write(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_log *log,
>> static int vhost_update_used_flags(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> {
>> 	void __user *used;
>> -	if (vhost_put_user(vq, cpu_to_vhost16(vq, vq->used_flags),
>> -			   &vq->used->flags) < 0)
>> +	if (vhost_put_used_flags(vq))
>> 		return -EFAULT;
>> 	if (unlikely(vq->log_used)) {
>> 		/* Make sure the flag is seen before log. */
>> @@ -1858,8 +1922,7 @@ static int vhost_update_used_flags(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>
>> static int vhost_update_avail_event(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, u16 avail_event)
>> {
>> -	if (vhost_put_user(vq, cpu_to_vhost16(vq, vq->avail_idx),
>> -			   vhost_avail_event(vq)))
>> +	if (vhost_put_avail_event(vq))
>> 		return -EFAULT;
>> 	if (unlikely(vq->log_used)) {
>> 		void __user *used;
>> @@ -1895,7 +1958,7 @@ int vhost_vq_init_access(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> 		r = -EFAULT;
>> 		goto err;
>> 	}
>> -	r = vhost_get_used(vq, last_used_idx, &vq->used->idx);
>> +	r = vhost_get_used_idx(vq, &last_used_idx);
>> 	if (r) {
>> 		vq_err(vq, "Can't access used idx at %p\n",
>> 		       &vq->used->idx);
>  From the error case, it looks like you are not entirely encapsulating
> knowledge of what the accessor uses, i.e. it’s not:
>
> 		vq_err(vq, "Can't access used idx at %p\n",
> 		       &last_user_idx);
>
> Maybe move error message within accessor?


Good catch. Will fix but I still prefer to keep the place of vq_err(). 
Moving error message (if needed) could be done in the future.

Thanks


>
>> @@ -2094,7 +2157,7 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> 	last_avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
>>
>> 	if (vq->avail_idx == vq->last_avail_idx) {
>> -		if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail(vq, avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx))) {
>> +		if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail_idx(vq, &avail_idx))) {
>> 			vq_err(vq, "Failed to access avail idx at %p\n",
>> 				&vq->avail->idx);
>> 			return -EFAULT;
> Same here.
>
>> @@ -2121,8 +2184,7 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>>
>> 	/* Grab the next descriptor number they're advertising, and increment
>> 	 * the index we've seen. */
>> -	if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail(vq, ring_head,
>> -		     &vq->avail->ring[last_avail_idx & (vq->num - 1)]))) {
>> +	if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail_head(vq, &ring_head, last_avail_idx))) {
>> 		vq_err(vq, "Failed to read head: idx %d address %p\n",
>> 		       last_avail_idx,
>> 		       &vq->avail->ring[last_avail_idx % vq->num]);
>> @@ -2157,8 +2219,7 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> 			       i, vq->num, head);
>> 			return -EINVAL;
>> 		}
>> -		ret = vhost_copy_from_user(vq, &desc, vq->desc + i,
>> -					   sizeof desc);
>> +		ret = vhost_get_desc(vq, &desc, i);
>> 		if (unlikely(ret)) {
>> 			vq_err(vq, "Failed to get descriptor: idx %d addr %p\n",
>> 			       i, vq->desc + i);
>> @@ -2251,7 +2312,7 @@ static int __vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>>
>> 	start = vq->last_used_idx & (vq->num - 1);
>> 	used = vq->used->ring + start;
>> -	if (vhost_copy_to_user(vq, used, heads, count * sizeof *used)) {
>> +	if (vhost_put_used(vq, heads, start, count)) {
>> 		vq_err(vq, "Failed to write used");
>> 		return -EFAULT;
>> 	}
>> @@ -2293,8 +2354,7 @@ int vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vring_used_elem *heads,
>>
>> 	/* Make sure buffer is written before we update index. */
>> 	smp_wmb();
>> -	if (vhost_put_user(vq, cpu_to_vhost16(vq, vq->last_used_idx),
>> -			   &vq->used->idx)) {
>> +	if (vhost_put_used_idx(vq)) {
>> 		vq_err(vq, "Failed to increment used idx");
>> 		return -EFAULT;
>> 	}
>> @@ -2327,7 +2387,7 @@ static bool vhost_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>
>> 	if (!vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) {
>> 		__virtio16 flags;
>> -		if (vhost_get_avail(vq, flags, &vq->avail->flags)) {
>> +		if (vhost_get_avail_flags(vq, &flags)) {
>> 			vq_err(vq, "Failed to get flags");
>> 			return true;
>> 		}
>> @@ -2341,7 +2401,7 @@ static bool vhost_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> 	if (unlikely(!v))
>> 		return true;
>>
>> -	if (vhost_get_avail(vq, event, vhost_used_event(vq))) {
>> +	if (vhost_get_used_event(vq, &event)) {
>> 		vq_err(vq, "Failed to get used event idx");
>> 		return true;
>> 	}
>> @@ -2386,7 +2446,7 @@ bool vhost_vq_avail_empty(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> 	if (vq->avail_idx != vq->last_avail_idx)
>> 		return false;
>>
>> -	r = vhost_get_avail(vq, avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx);
>> +	r = vhost_get_avail_idx(vq, &avail_idx);
>> 	if (unlikely(r))
>> 		return false;
>> 	vq->avail_idx = vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx);
>> @@ -2422,7 +2482,7 @@ bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> 	/* They could have slipped one in as we were doing that: make
>> 	 * sure it's written, then check again. */
>> 	smp_mb();
>> -	r = vhost_get_avail(vq, avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx);
>> +	r = vhost_get_avail_idx(vq, &avail_idx);
>> 	if (r) {
>> 		vq_err(vq, "Failed to check avail idx at %p: %d\n",
>> 		       &vq->avail->idx, r);
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization