From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>, "Gavin Li" <gavinl@nvidia.com>,
"Gavi Teitz" <gavi@nvidia.com>, "Parav Pandit" <parav@nvidia.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] virtio-net: fix received length check in big packets
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 21:39:30 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd963708-784a-4b1e-a44e-6fb799937707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1761206734.6182284-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
On 10/23/25 15:05, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 23:06:23 +0700, Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since commit 4959aebba8c0 ("virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length
>> for big packets"), when guest gso is off, the allocated size for big
>> packets is not MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE anymore but depends on
>> negotiated MTU. The number of allocated frags for big packets is stored
>> in vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags.
>>
>> Because the host announced buffer length can be malicious (e.g. the host
>> vhost_net driver's get_rx_bufs is modified to announce incorrect
>> length), we need a check in virtio_net receive path. Currently, the
>> check is not adapted to the new change which can lead to NULL page
>> pointer dereference in the below while loop when receiving length that
>> is larger than the allocated one.
>>
>> This commit fixes the received length check corresponding to the new
>> change.
>>
>> Fixes: 4959aebba8c0 ("virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Remove unrelated changes, add more comments
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Convert BUG_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Remove incorrect give_pages call
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index a757cbcab87f..0ffe78b3fd8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> {
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>> struct virtio_net_common_hdr *hdr;
>> - unsigned int copy, hdr_len, hdr_padded_len;
>> + unsigned int copy, hdr_len, hdr_padded_len, max_remaining_len;
>> struct page *page_to_free = NULL;
>> int tailroom, shinfo_size;
>> char *p, *hdr_p, *buf;
>> @@ -915,13 +915,23 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> * This is here to handle cases when the device erroneously
>> * tries to receive more than is possible. This is usually
>> * the case of a broken device.
>> + *
>> + * The number of allocated pages for big packet is
>> + * vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags + 1, the start of first page is
>> + * for virtio header, the remaining is for data. We need to ensure
>> + * the remaining len does not go out of the allocated pages.
>> + * Please refer to add_recvbuf_big for more details on big packet
>> + * buffer allocation.
>> */
>> - if (unlikely(len > MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE)) {
>> + BUG_ON(offset >= PAGE_SIZE);
>> + max_remaining_len = (unsigned int)PAGE_SIZE - offset;
>> + max_remaining_len += vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags * PAGE_SIZE;
>
> Could we perform this check inside `receive_big` to avoid computing
> `max_remaining_len` altogether? Instead, we could directly compare `len` against
> `(vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags + 1) * PAGE_SIZE`.
That looks better, I'll do that in the next version.
> And I’d like to know if this check is necessary for other modes as well.
Other modes have this check as well. check_mergeable_len is used in
mergeable mode. In receive_small, there is a check
if (unlikely(len > GOOD_PACKET_LEN)) {
goto err;
Thanks,
Quang Minh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 16:06 [PATCH net v4] virtio-net: fix received length check in big packets Bui Quang Minh
2025-10-23 2:36 ` Jason Wang
2025-10-23 8:05 ` Xuan Zhuo
2025-10-23 14:39 ` Bui Quang Minh [this message]
2025-10-23 15:06 ` Bui Quang Minh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd963708-784a-4b1e-a44e-6fb799937707@gmail.com \
--to=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=gavi@nvidia.com \
--cc=gavinl@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).