virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] block: add an API to atomically update queue limits
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:08:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de3cd926-c78c-4e68-bee0-2f571ccdaf8d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122173645.1686078-4-hch@lst.de>

On 1/22/24 18:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a new queue_limits_{start,commit}_update pair of functions that
> allows taking an atomic snapshot of queue limits, update it, and
> commit it if it passes validity checking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   block/blk-core.c       |   1 +
>   block/blk-settings.c   | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   block/blk.h            |   1 +
>   include/linux/blkdev.h |  23 +++++++
>   4 files changed, 165 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 11342af420d0c4..09f4a44a4aa3cc 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(int node_id)
>   	mutex_init(&q->debugfs_mutex);
>   	mutex_init(&q->sysfs_lock);
>   	mutex_init(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);
> +	mutex_init(&q->limits_lock);
>   	mutex_init(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
>   	spin_lock_init(&q->queue_lock);
>   
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index e872b0e168525e..b6692143ccf034 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,146 @@ static void blk_apply_bdi_limits(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>   	bdi->io_pages = lim->max_sectors >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
>   }
>   
> +static int blk_validate_zoned_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
> +{
> +	if (!lim->zoned) {
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_open_zones) ||
> +		    WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_active_zones) ||
> +		    WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->zone_write_granularity) ||
> +		    WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_zone_append_sectors))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (lim->zone_write_granularity < lim->logical_block_size)
> +		lim->zone_write_granularity = lim->logical_block_size;
> +
> +	if (lim->max_zone_append_sectors) {
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!lim->chunk_sectors))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		lim->max_zone_append_sectors =
> +			min3(lim->max_hw_sectors,
> +			     lim->max_zone_append_sectors,
> +			     lim->chunk_sectors);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
> +{
> +	unsigned int max_hw_sectors;
> +
> +	if (!lim->logical_block_size)
> +		lim->logical_block_size = SECTOR_SIZE;
> +
> +	if (!lim->physical_block_size)
> +		lim->physical_block_size = SECTOR_SIZE;
> +	if (lim->physical_block_size < lim->logical_block_size)
> +		lim->physical_block_size = lim->physical_block_size;
> +
> +	if (!lim->io_min)
> +		lim->io_min = SECTOR_SIZE;
> +	if (lim->io_min < lim->physical_block_size)
> +		lim->io_min = lim->physical_block_size;
> +
> +	if (!lim->max_hw_sectors)
> +		lim->max_hw_sectors = BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS;
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_hw_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / SECTOR_SIZE))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	lim->max_hw_sectors = round_down(lim->max_hw_sectors,
> +			lim->logical_block_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> +
> +	max_hw_sectors = min_not_zero(lim->max_hw_sectors,
> +				lim->max_dev_sectors);
> +	if (lim->max_user_sectors) {
> +		if (lim->max_user_sectors > max_hw_sectors ||
> +		    lim->max_user_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / SECTOR_SIZE)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		lim->max_sectors = min(max_hw_sectors, lim->max_user_sectors);
> +	} else {
> +		lim->max_sectors = min(max_hw_sectors, BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS_CAP);
> +	}
> +
> +	lim->max_sectors = round_down(lim->max_sectors,
> +			lim->logical_block_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> +
> +	if (!lim->max_segments)
> +		lim->max_segments = BLK_MAX_SEGMENTS;
> +
> +	lim->max_discard_sectors = lim->max_hw_discard_sectors;
> +	if (!lim->max_discard_segments)
> +		lim->max_discard_segments = 1;
> +
> +	if (lim->discard_granularity < lim->physical_block_size)
> +		lim->discard_granularity = lim->physical_block_size;
> +
> +	if (!lim->seg_boundary_mask)
> +		lim->seg_boundary_mask = BLK_SEG_BOUNDARY_MASK;
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->seg_boundary_mask < PAGE_SIZE - 1))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!lim->max_segment_size)
> +		lim->max_segment_size = BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE;
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_segment_size < PAGE_SIZE))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Devices that require a virtual boundary do not support scatter/gather
> +	 * I/O natively, but instead require a descriptor list entry for each
> +	 * page (which might not be idential to the Linux PAGE_SIZE).  Because
> +	 * of that they are not limited by our notion of "segment size".
> +	 */
> +	if (lim->virt_boundary_mask) {
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_segment_size &&
> +				 lim->max_segment_size != UINT_MAX))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		lim->max_segment_size = UINT_MAX;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!lim->dma_alignment)
> +		lim->dma_alignment = SECTOR_SIZE - 1;
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->dma_alignment > PAGE_SIZE))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (lim->alignment_offset) {
> +		lim->alignment_offset &= (lim->physical_block_size - 1);
> +		lim->misaligned = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return blk_validate_zoned_limits(lim);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * queue_limits_commit_update - commit an atomic update of queue limits
> + * @q:		queue to update
> + * @lim:	limits to apply
> + *
> + * Apply the limits in @lim that were obtained from queue_limits_start_update()
> + * and updated by the caller to @q.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 if successful, else a negative error code.
> + */
> +int queue_limits_commit_update(struct request_queue *q,
> +		struct queue_limits *lim)
> +	__releases(q->limits_lock)
> +{
> +	int error = blk_validate_limits(lim);
> +
> +	if (!error) {
> +		q->limits = *lim;
> +		if (q->disk)
> +			blk_apply_bdi_limits(q->disk->bdi, lim);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&q->limits_lock);
> +	return error;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(queue_limits_commit_update);
> +
>   /**
>    * blk_queue_bounce_limit - set bounce buffer limit for queue
>    * @q: the request queue for the device
> diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
> index 1ef920f72e0f87..58b5dbac2a487d 100644
> --- a/block/blk.h
> +++ b/block/blk.h
> @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ static inline void bio_release_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page)
>   		unpin_user_page(page);
>   }
>   
> +int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim);
>   struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(int node_id);
>   
>   int disk_scan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, blk_mode_t mode);
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 4a2e82c7971c86..5b5d3b238de1e7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -473,6 +473,7 @@ struct request_queue {
>   
>   	struct mutex		sysfs_lock;
>   	struct mutex		sysfs_dir_lock;
> +	struct mutex		limits_lock;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * for reusing dead hctx instance in case of updating
> @@ -861,6 +862,28 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_chunk_sectors_left(sector_t offset,
>   	return chunk_sectors - (offset & (chunk_sectors - 1));
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * queue_limits_start_update - start an atomic update of queue limits
> + * @q:		queue to update
> + *
> + * This functions starts an atomic update of the queue limits.  It takes a lock
> + * to prevent other updates and returns a snapshot of the current limits that
> + * the caller can modify.  The caller must call queue_limits_commit_update()
> + * to finish the update.
> + *
> + * Context: process context.  The caller must have frozen the queue or ensured
> + * that there is outstanding I/O by other means.
> + */
> +static inline struct queue_limits
> +queue_limits_start_update(struct request_queue *q)
> +	__acquires(q->limits_lock)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&q->limits_lock);
> +	return q->limits;
> +}

I'm slightly confused about the lifetime of the returned structure.
By my understanding, the returned 'struct queue_limit' is allocated
on the stack of the caller, right?
Shouldn't we note this somewhere such that people don't start passing
the structure around, or, worse, calling 'kfree()' on it?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald,
Werner Knoblich


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-24  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-22 17:36 atomic queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 01/15] block: move max_{open,active}_zones to struct queue_limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  4:39   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  6:00   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 02/15] block: refactor disk_update_readahead Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  4:41   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-23  8:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24  6:01   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: add an API to atomically update queue limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  4:50   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-23  8:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24  6:08   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2024-01-24  9:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 10:28   ` John Garry
2024-01-25 14:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 04/15] block: use queue_limits_commit_update in queue_max_sectors_store Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:07   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  6:09   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 05/15] block: add a max_user_discard_sectors queue limit Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 18:27   ` Keith Busch
2024-01-22 18:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24 15:44       ` Keith Busch
2024-01-25  8:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24  6:10   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 06/15] nvme: remove the hack to not update the discard limits in nvme_config_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:12   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-23  8:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24  6:11   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 07/15] block: use queue_limits_commit_update in queue_discard_max_store Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:16   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  6:12   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 08/15] block: pass a queue_limits argument to blk_alloc_queue Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:17   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  6:14   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-25  9:45   ` John Garry
2024-01-25 14:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 09/15] block: pass a queue_limits argument to blk_mq_init_queue Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:19   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  6:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 10/15] block: pass a queue_limits argument to blk_mq_alloc_disk Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:22   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  6:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 11/15] virtio_blk: split virtblk_probe Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:26   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-23 14:16   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-01-23 20:23   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-01-24  6:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 12/15] virtio_blk: pass queue_limits to blk_mq_alloc_disk Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:27   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-23 14:19   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-01-24  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-28 14:25   ` John Garry
2024-06-29  5:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-30  9:55       ` John Garry
2024-07-01  4:54         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 13/15] loop: cleanup loop_config_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:28   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  5:29   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-01-24  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 14/15] loop: pass queue_limits to blk_mq_alloc_disk Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:29   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  6:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-22 17:36 ` [PATCH 15/15] loop: use the atomic queue limits update API Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-23  5:31   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-01-24  6:22   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de3cd926-c78c-4e68-bee0-2f571ccdaf8d@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).