From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] iommu: Add iopf domain attach/detach/replace interface
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:21:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e77922a5-89d3-4036-8d98-9c3fbef4f39c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5276151E34AC91883986A39D8C572@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2024/2/21 14:49, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> +struct iopf_attach_cookie {
>>>> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + unsigned int pasid;
>>>> + refcount_t users;
>>>> +
>>>> + void *private;
>>>> + void (*release)(struct iopf_attach_cookie *cookie);
>>>> +};
>>> this cookie has nothing specific to iopf.
>>>
>>> it may makes more sense to build a generic iommu_attach_device_cookie()
>>> helper so the same object can be reused in future other usages too.
>>>
>>> within iommu core it can check domain iopf handler and this generic cookie
>>> to update iopf specific data e.g. the pasid_cookie xarray.
>> This means attaching an iopf-capable domain follows two steps:
>>
>> 1) Attaching the domain to the device.
>> 2) Setting up the iopf data, necessary for handling iopf data.
>>
>> This creates a time window during which the iopf is enabled, but the
>> software cannot handle it. Or not?
>>
> why two steps? in attach you can setup the iopf data when recognizing
> that the domain is iopf capable...
Oh, maybe I misunderstood. So your proposal is to make the new interface
generic, not for iopf only?
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 7:38 [PATCH v3 0/8] IOMMUFD: Deliver IO page faults to user space Lu Baolu
2024-01-22 7:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] iommu: Add iopf domain attach/detach/replace interface Lu Baolu
2024-02-07 8:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-02-21 5:52 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-21 6:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-02-21 7:21 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2024-02-21 7:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-01-22 7:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] iommu/sva: Use iopf domain attach/detach interface Lu Baolu
2024-03-08 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-14 7:41 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-22 16:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-25 3:52 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-22 7:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] iommufd: Add fault and response message definitions Lu Baolu
2024-03-08 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-14 13:41 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-22 17:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-25 3:57 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-22 7:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] iommufd: Add iommufd fault object Lu Baolu
2024-03-08 18:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-15 1:46 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-22 17:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-25 5:01 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-20 16:18 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-03-22 17:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-25 3:26 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-25 4:02 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-22 7:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] iommufd: Associate fault object with iommufd_hw_pgtable Lu Baolu
2024-02-07 8:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-02-21 6:06 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-02 2:36 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-03-06 15:15 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-03-06 16:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-07 1:54 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-08 17:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-08 19:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-15 1:16 ` Baolu Lu
2024-03-22 17:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-25 4:59 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-22 7:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] iommufd: IOPF-capable hw page table attach/detach/replace Lu Baolu
2024-02-20 13:57 ` Joel Granados
2024-02-21 6:15 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-22 7:39 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] iommufd/selftest: Add IOPF support for mock device Lu Baolu
2024-01-22 7:39 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for IOPF test Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e77922a5-89d3-4036-8d98-9c3fbef4f39c@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).