From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f173.google.com (mail-pf1-f173.google.com [209.85.210.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B66BE5E for ; Sat, 31 May 2025 08:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748681528; cv=none; b=Rg8Wy2Qv0wlnpqFLyb0AigmjKt7i+5AsALlqflwjTg7b6RTaFqTruhF+R+COZC0rV420BeOLZVYuWXBc8XGbyrvxG8TBJE5A14g3BWrN0uEAnBDRc/ipS/6Wi72yhaGakGU7b4JdAi5STGZszlZFhMJz2zCvj0UM4rMWp2nPscQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748681528; c=relaxed/simple; bh=REe60zlbqeu01BOJVePubuQZLx8kofDHdn8NxkEDkks=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Vblc3wbrUEjjHjqzV0r1WzwN+Y04r5kHgA7p1rpgEGfALyDD48/6jV5Myyh12mZ2vckt07UartyglysDrMVQ9vsSW/SIDfUHdTRTLkMvzULWzmcviqeaybNt3KzaEZ+JAhDBiMBENdYcXg7EORI2DSuOecixdJpJe8UnhPo9vwI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=erOt4QR7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="erOt4QR7" Received: by mail-pf1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7406c6dd2b1so3191341b3a.0 for ; Sat, 31 May 2025 01:52:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1748681526; x=1749286326; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=REe60zlbqeu01BOJVePubuQZLx8kofDHdn8NxkEDkks=; b=erOt4QR7x/uBEh4VJZfuuVul8uc28eO2ERVvJOotBEC65+ebVcYC8lWlS8S7JyS7rL bx6UBAgD5uc5jqNzLu17Q9WpJtwL5wGmbPLCn5oNMCSbn0G53YjgfrSKoOHcIQrGJ8Hw RoI6Zd0EeCQ4OHwbN5Zaj9/wO4b8+NUkdxuUMJ7pcaOjoDP2lGt3ze6xslQCo8HkGtVM cWj8otXm5/EZL5nhGJvdjUH/BNyhSWZ8A01WSti32zNZSg7qADMKg5DN9sHCEb0lI6/h 3UNmXR5l/3TKPDpaBSTWxTtJloMIdnlCAlXGzi+MXPi/EFDvDTFa+WEssMtkuIi5y0yX hcUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748681526; x=1749286326; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=REe60zlbqeu01BOJVePubuQZLx8kofDHdn8NxkEDkks=; b=uPS+PXwpckD2SJ6w/cSGnrzatT4TZbrgsrHRJwHgDXUuDLiISUq8MhjgXl/ARTv//A AjdZqmrzqBQdJ1WLIgH7QE65hb1MSREWQyqUjRHJ9QePG9lVgxQFz4ypBCIl9+vRN020 CnStdgUj/x/+HiDtGbCSoVlfThhn1No769e3/qwVX03mBTlK90WMLvcpDoXSbr4xwckS GzRSx512ksUgv0XSPPgTLpAPkBNqrm7cpgM8xvUnxbdzniaXq1mE8oq7YAraUtuEdLZT h3IGeg97qpbEqrzgkkwWVI6CDjsO5YBv4AiIqFFeNbiYUPPK7QdHXtC04VoiAxVIQqmZ ICEA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWNrrkQ9RnUl+5k0ef9CTrbHfzRu+U4JE1kqjHwR8Yn8PQAcgN3iwB6mczRrBQCa3vXEVenMZM3yXrKv/Ovsg==@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YymSE2YbykqvVy4+MhCPW93Lywtlfg8a1M4Y80Mzr6Ownw/P4Zg K5HmDB4jKYgDJ/GYQ4hWB9FveVJ/FsUFXztPMWEVD0K8bA7R1F4aTEuo X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvULJxhWx0ohLiTVgt6AvyEyihj+bN+Oqkr0y7f2oSxYP3SUmvdBNzfnIFRD2I WKDyb5ZL0aITo0fLWFzcspYPXbnhtW8qXXPa9RtbvpF7wDMWvk7AThiuY+V0l6nVEu8yUwLpYqk +no4ePwppD6vU7kuwXLJnAfa9R2nbbj+GRExgrd0YmUA+zBkpjL2dr5rQgReegMkYP3LPmw6iiT jXjoWAcKThxG+4HZOdxy/o5CuSEMQU+m7xXMVK/tZf3S60kr/Fmec2soija2PXkwkVQBMymgKh8 rup4hHiFACNs+eGkChMAF1XQsRYIHkU/5ZRVH9jOo46HTkj8qWRSbB1J81/lbd0SIIzHudmwdLk /FyYf10PsighYj7sRXabyPYVLdjYBQpbRtdH9dG3y X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFrK8g6/dGJ+qH8DK2puY7/mPl63dYSmPTZk3WE+0FNPHkZ94c11mvWpcO4rQ5k5aBxw+s1VQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1a0b:b0:234:71c1:d34f with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-234f67a7c06mr152428215ad.8.1748681525735; Sat, 31 May 2025 01:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:ee0:4f0e:fb30:af83:9564:6a79:4f18? ([2001:ee0:4f0e:fb30:af83:9564:6a79:4f18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-23506cd362fsm39298485ad.116.2025.05.31.01.52.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 31 May 2025 01:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 15:51:57 +0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests: net: add XDP socket tests for virtio-net To: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , =?UTF-8?Q?Eugenio_P=C3=A9rez?= , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org References: <20250527161904.75259-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> <20250527161904.75259-3-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bui Quang Minh In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/30/25 18:45, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:29:14PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: >> On 5/29/25 18:18, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >>> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 11:19:04PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: >>>> This adds a test to test the virtio-net rx when there is a XDP socket >>>> bound to it. There are tests for both copy mode and zerocopy mode, both >>>> cases when XDP program returns XDP_PASS and XDP_REDIRECT to a XDP socket. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh >>> Hi Bui, >>> >>> have you considered adjusting xskxceiver for your needs? If yes and you >>> decided to go with another test app then what were the issues around it? >>> >>> This is yet another approach for xsk testing where we already have a >>> test framework. >> Hi, >> >> I haven't tried much hard to adapt xskxceiver. I did have a look at >> xskxceiver but I felt the supported topology is not suitable for my need. To >> test the receiving side in virtio-net, I use Qemu to set up virtio-net in >> the guest and vhost-net in the host side. The sending side is in the host >> and the receiving is in the guest so I can't figure out how to do that with >> xskxceiver. > I see - couldn't the python side be executing xdpsock then instead of your > own app? I'm not aware of xdpsock. Could you give the path to that file? > I wouldn't like to end up with several xsk tools for testing data path on > different environments.