From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dgilbert@interlog.com, mkp@kernel.org, loberman@redhat.com,
jmeneghi@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com,
vivek.kasireddy@intel.com, mst@redhat.com, jasowangio@gmail.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, vdonnefort@google.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
jgg@ziepe.ca, kevin.tian@intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
christian.koenig@amd.com, phasta@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
will@kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bobbyeshleman@meta.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
mason@kernel.org, aesteve@redhat.com, tjmercier@google.com,
harry@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, cuitao@kylinos.cn,
media-ci@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] tracing: account ring buffer pages and trace_array metadata to memcg
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 10:35:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f10075aa-0917-472c-855d-afabbc9697ff@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-202921@kernel.org>
Hi,
在 2026/11/7 21:27, sashiko-bot@kernel.org 写道:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
> issues to consider:
> - [Medium] tracing: alloc_cpu_data() mischarges global_trace and
> read-page swaps
Correct. Charging alloc_cpu_data() unconditionally pins the global
trace buffers to whoever first triggers the lazy expansion, and the
read-page swap can move charges between the reader's memcg and the
ring buffer.
> - [Medium] tracing: alloc_cpu_data() memcg limit triggers
> trace_rb_cpu_prepare() WARN
Also possible. With __GFP_ACCOUNT, allocation failures from memcg
limits can now reach this path as well, making the existing WARN()
reachable from a constrained memcg. I'll avoid charging allocations
performed from the hotplug prepare path in the respin.
> - [Low] tracing: inaccurate snapshot size claim and inconsistent
> GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT use
The snapshot size description in the changelog will be corrected in the
respin.
> It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
> introduce:
> - [Medium] tracing: memory leak in trace_array_create_systems() [1]
That one predates this series as well. I'll investigate it separately
and send a dedicated fix if confirmed.
The v2 respin narrows the accounting. Only buffers belonging to
non-root trace instances will be allocated with __GFP_ACCOUNT (via a
new RB_FL_ACCOUNT flag). The global trace, read-page pool and CPU
hotplug allocations will remain unaccounted, and the changelog will be
updated accordingly.
Thank
> --
>
> commit a11da3138f9fda850c1b05bae82b0be7e738b994
> Author: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>
> tracing: account ring buffer pages and trace_array metadata to memcg
>
> This commit adds __GFP_ACCOUNT to ring buffer subbuffer allocations in
> alloc_cpu_data() and switches trace_array allocations in
> trace_array_create_systems() to GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT.
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
>> index e760d2fe386fb..f925936378639 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
>> @@ -441,7 +441,13 @@ static struct buffer_data_page *alloc_cpu_data(int cpu, int order)
>> * gracefully without invoking oom-killer and the system is not
>> * destabilized.
>> */
>> - mflags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_COMP | __GFP_ZERO;
>> + /*
>> + * The subbuffers are charged to the memcg of whoever caused the
>> + * allocation: the creator of a trace instance, or root at boot for
>> + * the global trace.
>> + */
>> + mflags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_COMP | __GFP_ZERO |
>> + __GFP_ACCOUNT;
>>
>> page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), mflags, order);
>> if (!page)
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does charging every alloc_cpu_data() call to current's memcg misattribute
> global_trace subbuffers and swapped read pages?
>
> At boot, tracer_alloc_buffers() keeps global_trace at its minimum size
> (ring_buf_size = 1) when ring_buffer_expanded is false. global_trace is
> only expanded to trace_buf_size at runtime in tracing_update_buffers() or
> tracing_set_tracer() when a task first enables an event, sets a tracer, or
> loads a module using trace_printk(). With __GFP_ACCOUNT in
> alloc_cpu_data(), those global_trace pages are charged to whichever cgroup
> triggers the lazy expansion and stay pinned to that memcg because
> global_trace is never freed.
>
> In addition, ring_buffer_alloc_read_page() calls alloc_cpu_data() when
> reading or splicing from trace_pipe_raw, and ring_buffer_read_page() swaps
> that reader-allocated page directly into reader->page while handing the old
> ring buffer page back to the reader to be freed:
>
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:ring_buffer_read_page() {
> ...
> dpage = reader->page;
> reader->page = data_page->data;
> local_set(&reader->write, 0);
> local_set(&reader->entries, 0);
> reader->read = 0;
> data_page->data = dpage;
> ...
> }
>
> A host process reading trace_pipe_raw from a container's instance will
> replace the container's charged pages with uncharged pages and uncharge the
> container as the old pages are freed, while a cgroup task reading
> global_trace will swap pages charged to its own memcg into global_trace.
> Similarly, trace_rb_cpu_prepare() during runtime CPU hotplug allocates
> per-CPU buffers for all existing instances in the context of the task
> onlining the CPU.
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can hitting the memcg limit in alloc_cpu_data() during instance creation
> trigger the WARN(1) in trace_rb_cpu_prepare()?
>
> When alloc_buffer() creates a ring buffer, it allocates the first CPU's
> buffer directly and then calls
> cpuhp_state_add_instance(CPUHP_TRACE_RB_PREPARE, &buffer->node), which runs
> trace_rb_cpu_prepare() for each remaining present CPU:
>
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:trace_rb_cpu_prepare() {
> ...
> buffer->buffers[cpu] =
> rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(buffer, nr_pages, cpu);
> if (!buffer->buffers[cpu]) {
> WARN(1, "failed to allocate ring buffer on CPU %u\n",
> cpu);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> Because __rb_allocate_pages() only checks si_mem_available() against global
> memory, a cgroup with enough headroom for the first CPU (~1.375 MB) that
> hits its memcg limit on any subsequent CPU in trace_rb_cpu_prepare() will
> trigger this WARN(1) and crash the host if panic_on_warn is set.
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> index 08614af8fad1c..fd1cfd1f66fbe 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> @@ -8677,11 +8677,11 @@ trace_array_create_systems(const char *name, const char *systems,
>> int ret;
>>
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> - tr = kzalloc_obj(*tr);
>> + tr = kzalloc_obj(*tr, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>> if (!tr)
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>
>> - tr->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + tr->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>> if (!tr->name)
>> goto out_free_tr;
>>
>> @@ -8692,7 +8692,7 @@ trace_array_create_systems(const char *name, const char *systems,
>> goto out_free_tr;
>>
>> if (systems) {
>> - tr->system_names = kstrdup_const(systems, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + tr->system_names = kstrdup_const(systems, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>> if (!tr->system_names)
>> goto out_free_tr;
>> }
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Should the alloc_cpumask_var() and zalloc_cpumask_var() calls right between
> tr->name and tr->system_names, as well as alloc_cpu_page() and
> alloc_cpu_buffer() in ring_buffer.c, also use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT?
>
> Also, the commit message says creating an instance immediately allocates a
> full ~1.375 MB per-CPU snapshot buffer, but trace_allocate_snapshot() passes
> size = 1 when allocate_snapshot is false (which is always the case after
> boot), so snapshot_buffer only allocates the minimum pages until a snapshot
> is armed.
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but in
> trace_array_create_systems() [1], does the out_free_tr error path leak
> tr->tracers when trace_array_create_dir() fails?
>
> trace_array_create_dir() calls __update_tracer() -> add_tracer(), which
> allocates struct tracers and struct tracer_flags entries on tr->tracers. If
> a later step in trace_array_create_dir() fails and jumps to out_free_tr,
> nothing calls free_tracers(tr), leaking the entries already added to
> tr->tracers.
>
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-9449d18e-1233-4181-9199-09eaead7b576
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 13:18 [PATCH 0/7] memcg: account the remaining uncharged kernel allocations Tao Cui
2026-11-06 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] scsi: sg and st: account the command buffer memory to memcg Tao Cui
2026-11-07 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 2:25 ` Tao Cui
2026-11-06 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] dma-buf/udmabuf: account the page array metadata " Tao Cui
2026-11-06 13:23 ` Christian König
2026-11-06 17:25 ` T.J. Mercier
2026-11-09 2:32 ` Tao Cui
2026-11-09 10:56 ` Christian König
2026-11-09 13:44 ` Albert Esteve
2026-11-07 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] vhost: account the per-device kernel allocations " Tao Cui
2026-11-07 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 13:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] tracing: account ring buffer pages and trace_array metadata " Tao Cui
2026-11-07 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 2:35 ` Tao Cui [this message]
2026-11-11 16:47 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-11 23:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-11-06 13:18 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommufd: account the hw_queue page array " Tao Cui
2026-11-07 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 13:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] io_uring: account the ring context and SQPOLL thread data " Tao Cui
2026-11-07 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 2:37 ` Tao Cui
2026-11-06 13:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] io_uring: account the remaining per-object allocations " Tao Cui
2026-11-07 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f10075aa-0917-472c-855d-afabbc9697ff@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=aesteve@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox