From: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
To: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, mst@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] vhost-vdpa: reset vendor specific mapping to initial state in .release
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:18:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f16baa51-d545-48a4-a46c-88b152339d85@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJaqyWe=RwotkcNKFuStvX=HxQh6sdtfsH23jhf994eXi3-2Og@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/11/2023 4:21 AM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:05 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Devices with on-chip IOMMU or vendor specific IOTLB implementation
>> may need to restore iotlb mapping to the initial or default state
>> using the .reset_map op, as it's desirable for some parent devices
>> to solely manipulate mappings by its own, independent of virtio device
>> state. For instance, device reset does not cause mapping go away on
>> such IOTLB model in need of persistent mapping. Before vhost-vdpa
>> is going away, give them a chance to reset iotlb back to the initial
>> state in vhost_vdpa_cleanup().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> index 851535f..a3f8160 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> @@ -131,6 +131,15 @@ static struct vhost_vdpa_as *vhost_vdpa_find_alloc_as(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>> return vhost_vdpa_alloc_as(v, asid);
>> }
>>
>> +static void vhost_vdpa_reset_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u32 asid)
>> +{
>> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>> +
>> + if (ops->reset_map)
>> + ops->reset_map(vdpa, asid);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int vhost_vdpa_remove_as(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u32 asid)
>> {
>> struct vhost_vdpa_as *as = asid_to_as(v, asid);
>> @@ -140,6 +149,13 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_remove_as(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u32 asid)
>>
>> hlist_del(&as->hash_link);
>> vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap(v, &as->iotlb, 0ULL, 0ULL - 1, asid);
> Now I'm wondering, does this call to vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap sets a
> different map (via .set_map) per element of the vhost_iotlb_itree?
Yes and no, effectively this vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap call will pass an
empty iotlb with zero map entry down to the driver via .set_map, so for
.set_map interface it's always a different map no matter what. As for
this special case, the internal implementation of mlx5_vdpa .set_map may
choose to either destroy MR and recreate a new one, or remove all
mappings on the existing MR (currently it uses destroy+recreate for
simplicity without have to special case). But .reset_map is different -
the 1:1 DMA MR has to be recreated explicitly after destroying the
regular MR, so you see this is driver/device implementation specifics.
> Not
> a big deal since we're in the cleanup path, but it could be a nice
> optimization on top as we're going to reset the map of the asid
> anyway.
You mean wrap up what's done in vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap and
vhost_vdpa_reset_map to a new call, say vhost_vdpa_iotlb_reset? Yes this
is possible, but be noted that the vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap also takes
charge of pinning accounting other than mapping, and it has to also
maintain it's own vhost_iotlb copy in sync. There's no such much code
that can be consolidated or generalized at this point, as
vhost_vdpa_reset_map() is very specific to some device implementation,
and I don't see common need to optimize this further up in the map/unmap
hot path rather than this cleanup slow path, just as you alluded to.
Regards,
-Siwei
>
>> + /*
>> + * Devices with vendor specific IOMMU may need to restore
>> + * iotlb to the initial or default state which is not done
>> + * through device reset, as the IOTLB mapping manipulation
>> + * could be decoupled from the virtio device life cycle.
>> + */
>> + vhost_vdpa_reset_map(v, asid);
>> kfree(as);
>>
>> return 0;
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-10 9:02 [PATCH 0/4] vdpa: decouple reset of iotlb mapping from device reset Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10 9:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] vdpa: introduce .reset_map operation callback Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-13 2:49 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13 7:36 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-16 5:30 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-10 9:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] vhost-vdpa: reset vendor specific mapping to initial state in .release Si-Wei Liu
[not found] ` <CAJaqyWe=RwotkcNKFuStvX=HxQh6sdtfsH23jhf994eXi3-2Og@mail.gmail.com>
2023-10-12 6:18 ` Si-Wei Liu [this message]
2023-10-13 3:01 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13 7:35 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-16 6:32 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-16 20:10 ` Si-Wei Liu
[not found] ` <CAJaqyWf0AhsS6kaGUMVCosDjuRoeCAqO3OTVC=veqjV3jCqUjQ@mail.gmail.com>
2023-10-16 20:30 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-17 2:35 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-18 4:35 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-18 5:27 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-18 7:00 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-18 8:49 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19 2:53 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-19 6:46 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19 8:27 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <CAJaqyWdMPVUd_zjd0nkQKvDmG2HPe5DBS-w5=mx4qSPCqtDJwg@mail.gmail.com>
2023-10-19 22:28 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-20 4:11 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-20 5:57 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-18 8:44 ` Si-Wei Liu
[not found] ` <CAJaqyWc01_YgkhLRs961a-K1P+Zj4P+6qGN1t=eOFFwGvQ001A@mail.gmail.com>
2023-10-18 23:21 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19 2:48 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-19 22:57 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10 9:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] vhost-vdpa: introduce IOTLB_PERSIST backend feature bit Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10 9:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] vdpa/mlx5: implement .reset_map driver op Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-13 3:04 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13 7:55 ` Si-Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f16baa51-d545-48a4-a46c-88b152339d85@oracle.com \
--to=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).