From: Vishwanath Seshagiri <vishs@meta.com>
To: Omar Elghoul <oelghoul@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, dw@davidwei.uk,
edumazet@google.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
kernel-team@meta.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, technoboy85@gmail.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11] virtio_net: add page_pool support for buffer allocation
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 13:50:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f91a42f7-1e90-4db0-923a-371dac8245e0@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b6bea74-4bff-4301-8dbf-a9c162456185@linux.ibm.com>
On 3/23/26 10:39 PM, Omar Elghoul wrote:
> On 3/23/26 12:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 11:52:34AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 11:01:31AM -0400, Omar Elghoul wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>> Well... I am not sure how I missed it. Obvious in hindsight:
>>>
>>> static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue
>>> *rq,
>>> void *buf, unsigned int len, void **ctx,
>>> unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
>>> struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
>>> {
>>> struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>>> u8 flags;
>>> if (unlikely(len < vi->hdr_len + ETH_HLEN)) {
>>> pr_debug("%s: short packet %i\n", dev->name, len);
>>> DEV_STATS_INC(dev, rx_length_errors);
>>> virtnet_rq_free_buf(vi, rq, buf);
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> /* About the flags below:
>>> * 1. Save the flags early, as the XDP program might
>>> overwrite them.
>>> * These flags ensure packets marked as
>>> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
>>> * stay valid after XDP processing.
>>> * 2. XDP doesn't work with partially checksummed packets
>>> (refer to
>>> * virtnet_xdp_set()), so packets marked as
>>> * VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM get dropped during XDP
>>> processing.
>>> */
>>> if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) {
>>> flags = ((struct virtio_net_common_hdr *)buf)-
>>> >hdr.flags;
>>> skb = receive_mergeable(dev, vi, rq, buf, ctx, len,
>>> xdp_xmit,
>>> stats);
>>> } else if (vi->big_packets) {
>>> void *p = page_address((struct page *)buf);
>>> flags = ((struct virtio_net_common_hdr *)p)->hdr.flags;
>>> skb = receive_big(dev, vi, rq, buf, len, stats);
>>> } else {
>>> flags = ((struct virtio_net_common_hdr *)buf)-
>>> >hdr.flags;
>>> skb = receive_small(dev, vi, rq, buf, ctx, len,
>>> xdp_xmit, stats);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> So we are reading the header, before dma sync, which is within
>>> receive_mergeable and friends:
>>>
>>> static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
>>> struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>> struct receive_queue *rq,
>>> void *buf,
>>> void *ctx,
>>> unsigned int len,
>>> unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
>>> struct virtnet_rq_stats
>>> *stats)
>>> {
>>> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr = buf;
>>> int num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
>>> struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
>>> int offset = buf - page_address(page);
>>> struct sk_buff *head_skb, *curr_skb;
>>> unsigned int truesize = mergeable_ctx_to_truesize(ctx);
>>> unsigned int headroom = mergeable_ctx_to_headroom(ctx);
>>> head_skb = NULL;
>>> if (rq->use_page_pool_dma)
>>> page_pool_dma_sync_for_cpu(rq->page_pool, page,
>>> offset, len);
>>>
>>>
>>> Just as a test, the below should fix it (compiled only), but the real
>>> fix is more complex since we need to be careful to avoid expensive
>>> syncing
>>> twice.
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> index 97035b49bae7..57b4f5954bed 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> @@ -931,9 +931,19 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct
>>> virtnet_info *vi,
>>> static void *virtnet_rq_get_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, u32 *len,
>>> void **ctx)
>>> {
>>> + void *buf;
>>> +
>>> BUG_ON(!rq->page_pool);
>>> - return virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(rq->vq, len, ctx);
>>> + buf = virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(rq->vq, len, ctx);
>>> + if (buf && rq->use_page_pool_dma && *len) {
>>> + struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
>>> + int offset = buf - page_address(page);
>>> +
>>> + page_pool_dma_sync_for_cpu(rq->page_pool, page, offset, *len);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return buf;
>>> }
>>> static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> MST
>> or maybe like this:
> Both of these patches resolve the issue on my end.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 97035b49bae7..835f52651006 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -1956,13 +1956,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct
>> net_device *dev,
>> */
>> buf -= VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;
>> - if (rq->use_page_pool_dma) {
>> - int offset = buf - page_address(page) +
>> - VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;
>> -
>> - page_pool_dma_sync_for_cpu(rq->page_pool, page, offset, len);
>> - }
>> -
>> len -= vi->hdr_len;
>> u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes, len);
>> @@ -2398,9 +2391,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct
>> net_device *dev,
>> head_skb = NULL;
>> - if (rq->use_page_pool_dma)
>> - page_pool_dma_sync_for_cpu(rq->page_pool, page, offset, len);
>> -
>> u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes, len - vi->hdr_len);
>> if (check_mergeable_len(dev, ctx, len))
>> @@ -2563,6 +2553,13 @@ static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info
>> *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
>> return;
>> }
>> + if (rq->use_page_pool_dma) {
>> + struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
>> + int offset = buf - page_address(page);
>> +
>> + page_pool_dma_sync_for_cpu(rq->page_pool, page, offset, len);
>> + }
>> +
>> /* About the flags below:
>> * 1. Save the flags early, as the XDP program might overwrite
>> them.
>> * These flags ensure packets marked as VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
>>
Hello Omar. Thank you for the bisect, apologies for breaking the
functionality. Thank you Michael for the patch, I will be careful next
time about DMA sync issues. Looks like the bug is fixed, is there
anything else needed from my end?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 18:31 [PATCH net-next v11] virtio_net: add page_pool support for buffer allocation Vishwanath Seshagiri
2026-03-13 7:51 ` Jason Wang
2026-03-13 9:26 ` Vishwanath Seshagiri
2026-03-16 7:41 ` Jason Wang
2026-03-13 16:50 ` Vishwanath Seshagiri
2026-03-16 7:35 ` Jason Wang
2026-03-16 9:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-16 10:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-16 11:57 ` Vishwanath Seshagiri
2026-03-16 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-17 2:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-03-23 15:01 ` Omar Elghoul
2026-03-23 15:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-23 16:54 ` Omar Elghoul
2026-03-23 17:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-23 16:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-23 17:09 ` Omar Elghoul
2026-03-23 17:50 ` Vishwanath Seshagiri [this message]
2026-03-23 23:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-24 0:34 ` Jason Wang
2026-03-24 8:20 ` Aithal, Srikanth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f91a42f7-1e90-4db0-923a-371dac8245e0@meta.com \
--to=vishs@meta.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oelghoul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=technoboy85@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox