From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:53:50 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20200616015718.7812-1-longman@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200616015718.7812-1-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Waiman Long , Andrew Morton , David Howells , Jarkko Sakkinen , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linus Torvalds , Matthew Wilcox , David Rientjes Cc: Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Dan Carpenter , David Sterba , "Jason A . Donenfeld" , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, keyrings-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-crypto-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-stm32-XDFAJ8BFU24N7RejjzZ/Li2xQDfSxrLKVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org, linux-amlogic-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-ppp-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, wireguard-/J5FBtcyxH5ZwnvJuMANYw@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, target-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-btrfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fscrypt@vger. List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 21:57 -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > v4: > - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter > so that it can be backported to stable. > - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for > now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be > introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged. To this larger audience and last week without reply: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/573b3fbd5927c643920e1364230c296b23e7584d.camel-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org/ Are there _any_ fastpath uses of kfree or vfree? Many patches have been posted recently to fix mispairings of specific types of alloc and free functions. To eliminate these mispairings at a runtime cost of four comparisons, should the kfree/vfree/kvfree/kfree_const functions be consolidated into a single kfree? Something like the below: void kfree(const void *addr) { if (is_kernel_rodata((unsigned long)addr)) return; if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr)) _vfree(addr); else _kfree(addr); } #define kvfree kfree #define vfree kfree #define kfree_const kfree