Linux virtualization list

* Re: [PATCH net V2] vhost: log dirty page correctly
From: Jason Wang @ 2019-01-10 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Jintack Lim, netdev, linux-kernel, kvm, virtualization
In-Reply-To: <20190109091937-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On 2019/1/9 下午10:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:29:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Vhost dirty page logging API is designed to sync through GPA. But we
>> try to log GIOVA when device IOTLB is enabled. This is wrong and may
>> lead to missing data after migration.
>>
>> To solve this issue, when logging with device IOTLB enabled, we will:
>>
>> 1) reuse the device IOTLB translation result of GIOVA->HVA mapping to
>>     get HVA, for writable descriptor, get HVA through iovec. For used
>>     ring update, translate its GIOVA to HVA
>> 2) traverse the GPA->HVA mapping to get the possible GPA and log
>>     through GPA. Pay attention this reverse mapping is not guaranteed
>>     to be unique, so we should log each possible GPA in this case.
>>
>> This fix the failure of scp to guest during migration. In -next, we
>> will probably support passing GIOVA->GPA instead of GIOVA->HVA.
>>
>> Fixes: 6b1e6cc7855b ("vhost: new device IOTLB API")
>> Reported-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
>> Cc: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> The patch is needed for stable.
>> Changes from V1:
>> - return error instead of warn
>> ---
>>   drivers/vhost/net.c   |  3 +-
>>   drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>   drivers/vhost/vhost.h |  3 +-
>>   3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> index 36f3d0f49e60..bca86bf7189f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> @@ -1236,7 +1236,8 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>   		if (nvq->done_idx > VHOST_NET_BATCH)
>>   			vhost_net_signal_used(nvq);
>>   		if (unlikely(vq_log))
>> -			vhost_log_write(vq, vq_log, log, vhost_len);
>> +			vhost_log_write(vq, vq_log, log, vhost_len,
>> +					vq->iov, in);
>>   		total_len += vhost_len;
>>   		if (unlikely(vhost_exceeds_weight(++recv_pkts, total_len))) {
>>   			vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> index 9f7942cbcbb2..ee095f08ffd4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> @@ -1733,11 +1733,70 @@ static int log_write(void __user *log_base,
>>   	return r;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int log_write_hva(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, u64 hva, u64 len)
>> +{
>> +	struct vhost_umem *umem = vq->umem;
>> +	struct vhost_umem_node *u;
>> +	u64 gpa;
>> +	int r;
>> +	bool hit = false;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(u, &umem->umem_list, link) {
>> +		if (u->userspace_addr < hva &&
>> +		    u->userspace_addr + u->size >=
>> +		    hva + len) {
> So this tries to see that the GPA range is completely within
> the GVA region. Does this have to be the case?

You mean e.g a buffer that crosses the boundary of two memory regions?

> And if yes why not return 0 below instead of hit = true?

I think it's safe but not sure for the case like two GPAs can map to 
same HVA?

> I'm also a bit concerned about overflow when addr + len is on a 64 bit
> boundary.  Why not check add + size - 1 and hva + len - 1 instead?

Let me fix this.

>
>
>> +			gpa = u->start + hva - u->userspace_addr;
>> +			r = log_write(vq->log_base, gpa, len);
>> +			if (r < 0)
>> +				return r;
>> +			hit = true;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!hit)
>> +		return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int log_used(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, u64 used_offset, u64 len)
>> +{
>> +	struct iovec iov[64];
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!vq->iotlb)
>> +		return log_write(vq->log_base, vq->log_addr + used_offset, len);
>> +
>> +	ret = translate_desc(vq, (u64)(uintptr_t)vq->used + used_offset,
>> +			     len, iov, 64, VHOST_ACCESS_WO);
>
> We don't need the cast to u64 here do we?
>
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
>> +		ret = log_write_hva(vq,	(u64)(uintptr_t)iov[i].iov_base,
>
> We don't need the cast to u64 here do we?
>
>> +				    iov[i].iov_len);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   int vhost_log_write(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_log *log,
>> -		    unsigned int log_num, u64 len)
>> +		    unsigned int log_num, u64 len, struct iovec *iov, int count)
>>   {
>>   	int i, r;
>>   
>> +	if (vq->iotlb) {
>> +		for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> +			r = log_write_hva(vq, (u64)(uintptr_t)iov[i].iov_base,
>> +					  iov[i].iov_len);
>
> We don't need the cast to u64 here do we?

Let me remove the unnecessary u64 cast.

>
>> +			if (r < 0)
>> +				return r;
>> +		}
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	/* Make sure data written is seen before log. */
>>   	smp_wmb();
> Shouldn't the wmb be before log_write_hva too?

Yes.

Thanks

>
>>   	for (i = 0; i < log_num; ++i) {
>> @@ -1769,9 +1828,8 @@ static int vhost_update_used_flags(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>   		smp_wmb();
>>   		/* Log used flag write. */
>>   		used = &vq->used->flags;
>> -		log_write(vq->log_base, vq->log_addr +
>> -			  (used - (void __user *)vq->used),
>> -			  sizeof vq->used->flags);
>> +		log_used(vq, (used - (void __user *)vq->used),
>> +			 sizeof vq->used->flags);
>>   		if (vq->log_ctx)
>>   			eventfd_signal(vq->log_ctx, 1);
>>   	}
>> @@ -1789,9 +1847,8 @@ static int vhost_update_avail_event(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, u16 avail_event)
>>   		smp_wmb();
>>   		/* Log avail event write */
>>   		used = vhost_avail_event(vq);
>> -		log_write(vq->log_base, vq->log_addr +
>> -			  (used - (void __user *)vq->used),
>> -			  sizeof *vhost_avail_event(vq));
>> +		log_used(vq, (used - (void __user *)vq->used),
>> +			 sizeof *vhost_avail_event(vq));
>>   		if (vq->log_ctx)
>>   			eventfd_signal(vq->log_ctx, 1);
>>   	}
>> @@ -2191,10 +2248,8 @@ static int __vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>>   		/* Make sure data is seen before log. */
>>   		smp_wmb();
>>   		/* Log used ring entry write. */
>> -		log_write(vq->log_base,
>> -			  vq->log_addr +
>> -			   ((void __user *)used - (void __user *)vq->used),
>> -			  count * sizeof *used);
>> +		log_used(vq, ((void __user *)used - (void __user *)vq->used),
>> +			 count * sizeof *used);
>>   	}
>>   	old = vq->last_used_idx;
>>   	new = (vq->last_used_idx += count);
>> @@ -2236,9 +2291,8 @@ int vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vring_used_elem *heads,
>>   		/* Make sure used idx is seen before log. */
>>   		smp_wmb();
>>   		/* Log used index update. */
>> -		log_write(vq->log_base,
>> -			  vq->log_addr + offsetof(struct vring_used, idx),
>> -			  sizeof vq->used->idx);
>> +		log_used(vq, offsetof(struct vring_used, idx),
>> +			 sizeof vq->used->idx);
>>   		if (vq->log_ctx)
>>   			eventfd_signal(vq->log_ctx, 1);
>>   	}
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>> index 466ef7542291..1b675dad5e05 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>> @@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ bool vhost_vq_avail_empty(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *);
>>   bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *);
>>   
>>   int vhost_log_write(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_log *log,
>> -		    unsigned int log_num, u64 len);
>> +		    unsigned int log_num, u64 len,
>> +		    struct iovec *iov, int count);
>>   int vq_iotlb_prefetch(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq);
>>   
>>   struct vhost_msg_node *vhost_new_msg(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int type);
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

^ permalink raw reply