Linux virtualization list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/virtio: defer RX readable notifications until batch unlock
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:49:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-169137@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013063112.168321-5-physicalmtea@gmail.com>

> An RX batch can make a socket readable while the worker still owns its
> socket lock. Waking a reader at that point can make it immediately wait
> for the same lock.
> 
> For the callback installed by sock_init_data(), record when the existing
> low-watermark condition is met and issue one notification after the batch
> releases the lock. Save the initial sock_def_readable() callback when the
> AF_VSOCK socket is created because virtio_transport_common can be built as
> a module and cannot refer to that unexported symbol directly.
> 
> Require the original protocol and both saved callbacks for batching.
> Sockets with callbacks installed by sockmap or another user retain their
> existing per-packet behavior.
> 
> A psock is published before sockmap replaces the callbacks and is excluded
> by the batch admission checks. If an attach races an active native batch,
> only a packet admitted before that publication can complete on the native
> path; the next packet ends the batch. No queued skb handoff is needed.
> 
> Keep the socket reference until the deferred callback completes. Control
> packets, state transitions, transport changes and non-batched sockets keep
> their existing behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013063112.168321-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com?part=4


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13  6:31 [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-13  6:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-10-13  6:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  6:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-10-13  6:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14  6:33   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-13  6:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] vsock/virtio: coalesce RX write-space notifications in lock batches Jia Jia
2026-10-13  6:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14  6:33   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-13  6:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/virtio: defer RX readable notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-10-13  6:49   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14  6:33   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-169137@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox