From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: resolve uncommon partial checksums at ingress
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:15:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-169596@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e12c6a45aae251d1642af55d8d3121e554993a66.1791887415.git.mst@redhat.com>
> A virtio net header can place CHECKSUM_PARTIAL at any in-packet
> offset. If that state is retained, later checksum completion can
> modify the packet after protocol processing has made decisions from it.
>
> Let's fix that: let's validate csum_start and csum_offset and only keep
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL when csum_start and csum_offset match a parsed TCP or
> UDP header, while handling VLAN headers, IPv4 options and IPv6 extension
> headers. Complete other non-GSO checksums immediately, before any
> protocol processing runs.
>
> We can't easily "complete the checksum" for GSO we don't recognize - GSO
> assumes knowledge of the protocol. We could segment ignoring the
> checksum then do whatever csum_start and csum_offset say, but that
> seems like an overkill for something that should happen.
>
> UDP tunnel headers get the same handling on the inner header.
>
> Packets without VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM are unaffected.
>
> Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1791887415.git.mst@redhat.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 10:58 [PATCH net-next 0/4] more virtio-net csum hardening Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: add ip4_parse() Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 10:59 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-13 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: use ip4_parse() in receive validation Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 10:59 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-13 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: resolve uncommon partial checksums at ingress Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 15:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-13 18:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 20:32 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-13 20:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 20:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-13 20:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 20:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 10:59 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-13 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: account for ingress-resolved virtio net hdr state Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:45 ` Björn Töpel
2026-10-13 18:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-14 10:59 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-13 11:05 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] more virtio-net csum hardening Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 18:51 ` Chris Arges
2026-10-13 14:41 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-13 18:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 20:29 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-13 20:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 20:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-13 20:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-169596@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox