From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] vsock/virtio: defer RX notifications until batch unlock
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:15:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171254@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014115640.184286-5-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> An RX batch can make a socket readable while the worker still holds its
> socket lock. Waking a blocking reader then only moves it to waiting for
> the same lock.
>
> Record the existing low-watermark condition and notify once after
> release_sock(). Move the coalesced write-space notification after the
> unlock as well, since both callbacks wake sk_sleep(sk). Deliver
> write-space before data-ready and keep the lookup reference until both
> callbacks complete.
>
> As with write-space, save the initial sk_data_ready callback and batch only
> while both saved callbacks remain installed. Sockets with replaced
> callbacks retain their per-packet behavior.
>
> The existing psock-marker check also covers a concurrent sockmap attach:
> at most the already admitted packet completes on the native path, and the
> next packet ends the batch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014115640.184286-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 11:56 [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-14 11:56 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-10-14 12:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 13:47 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-16 14:31 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-18 4:42 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-14 11:56 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-10-14 12:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 14:33 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-18 4:52 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-19 14:05 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-14 11:56 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] vsock/virtio: coalesce RX write-space notifications in lock batches Jia Jia
2026-10-14 12:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 14:07 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-18 4:58 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-16 14:40 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-18 4:54 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-19 14:10 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-14 11:56 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] vsock/virtio: defer RX notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-10-14 12:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16 14:42 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-18 4:55 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-19 14:11 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171254@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox