From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Thorsten Blum" <blum@kernel.org>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwrng: virtio - prevent use-after-free after a failed restore
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:47:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-174204@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016103640.4989-2-blum@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] virtio-rng: data race on data_avail leads to deadlock
--
commit 2904ec0356e25704559279a6336e7fed895c58d2
Author: Thorsten Blum <blum@kernel.org>
hwrng: virtio - prevent use-after-free after a failed restore
remove_common() frees the driver data during freeze, but does not clear
vdev->priv, which points to freed memory. Clear vdev->priv on the error
cleanup path and before freeing the driver data in remove_common(). Also
reset the device and return early from remove_common() if vdev->priv is
already NULL.
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> index f9982217247dd..45d87c0614a5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -198,6 +199,11 @@ static void remove_common(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct virtrng_info *vi = vdev->priv;
>
> + if (!vi) {
> + virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> vi->hwrng_removed = true;
> vi->data_avail = 0;
[Severity: High]
Does this code race with a reader and cause a deadlock?
In copy_data() in drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c, vi->data_avail is read,
memcpy() is called, and then size is subtracted:
drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c:copy_data() {
...
memcpy(buf, vi->data + idx, size);
vi->data_idx += size;
vi->data_avail -= size;
if (vi->data_avail == 0)
request_entropy(vi);
return size;
}
If remove_common() sets vi->data_avail to 0 before the subtraction, will this
cause an unsigned integer underflow, leaving vi->data_avail as a huge value?
Since vi->data_avail != 0, copy_data() would skip calling request_entropy().
virtio_read() would then consume the single completion from remove_common().
Seeing a huge data_avail instead of 0, virtio_read() would continue looping
and eventually block forever in wait_for_completion_killable() because no
pending entropy request will trigger a new completion:
drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c:virtio_read() {
...
while (size != 0) {
/* data_avail is 0 but a request is pending */
ret = wait_for_completion_killable(&vi->have_data);
...
}
Could this cause hwrng_unregister() in remove_common() to block forever
waiting for the reader to drop its reference, deadlocking device removal?
> vi->data_idx = 0;
> complete(&vi->have_data);
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016103640.4989-2-blum@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 10:36 [PATCH] hwrng: virtio - prevent use-after-free after a failed restore Thorsten Blum
2026-10-16 10:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-18 17:00 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2026-10-18 20:37 ` Thorsten Blum
2026-10-19 13:00 ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-174204@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=blum@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox