From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joonho Lee" <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ALSA: virtio: prioritize staged capture period work
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 06:03:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-175327@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rfc-virtio-snd-capture-followups-2.f2737c95c12e45b4@gmail.com>
> CPU contention can delay staged capture period notifications while RX
> completions continue filling the unread ring. In a two-vCPU VZ guest with
> 16 nice-0 CPU workers, the ACK-fixed baseline stopped with ring_capacity
> and EPIPE in three runs, after 11.74, 30.77 and 30.33 seconds of audio.
>
> Route staged capture period work through system_highpri_wq with a common
> helper at all ten producers, including ACK errors and self-requeue. Keep
> playback and non-staged streams on the normal workqueue. Initialization,
> cancellation, buffer geometry and capture accounting remain unchanged.
>
> With the same kernel, input, geometry and userspace priority, the candidate
> completed three 70-second captures and immediate reopens. Its maximum
> matched queue-to-start delay was 20.366 ms, versus 108.112 ms in the first
> baseline failure. The other baseline failures had pending work without
> matching execution, so matched-only statistics do not bound that delay.
>
> Reader scheduling delays were also present. Both arms passed a separate
> nice -10 reader control, and host load varied between runs. These results
> support the change for the tested workload without isolating a kernel-only
> cause or guaranteeing lossless capture under arbitrary CPU load.
> KASAN/lockdep QEMU regressions passed with the unchanged candidate source.
>
> This follows the staged ACK fix and pending VZ capture support. The
> introducing staged-capture patch has no upstream Fixes commit ID yet.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/rfc-v2-vz-capture-compat-1.b9ab4c1540dc4691@gmail.com/
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Joonho Lee <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/rfc-virtio-snd-capture-followups-0.f2737c95c12e45b4@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-17 6:00 [RFC PATCH 0/2] ALSA: virtio: fix staged capture ACK ordering and period scheduling Joonho Lee
2026-10-17 6:00 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ALSA: virtio: account staged capture reads before RX refill Joonho Lee
2026-10-17 6:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-17 6:00 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ALSA: virtio: prioritize staged capture period work Joonho Lee
2026-10-17 6:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-17 12:51 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] ALSA: virtio: fix staged capture ACK ordering and period scheduling Joonho Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-175327@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mynameisjune111@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox