From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joonho Lee" <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] ALSA: virtio: Recover PCM state after a failed start
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:18:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-187268@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027234334.32551-3-mynameisjune111@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] ALSA: virtio: unrecoverable stream state after failed suspend sync_stop()
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: unprepared stream left startable if virtsnd_pcm_prepare() fails
--
commit ff74351afcffdc15b798435ae2935317313176c5
Author: Joonho Lee <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>
ALSA: virtio: Recover PCM state after a failed start
This commit recovers virtio PCM substream state when a start trigger fails by
disabling transfers, marking the stream as stopped under vss->lock, and
arming runtime->stop_operating so virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() releases pending
I/O before subsequent prepare, hw_params, or start operations.
> diff --git a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
> index a40ea394bf174..970499fe419b4 100644
> --- a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
> +++ b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -115,7 +124,8 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> snd_pcm_hw_constraint_integer(substream->runtime,
> SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIODS);
>
> - vss->stopped = !!virtsnd_pcm_msg_pending_num(vss);
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock)
> + vss->stopped |= !!vss->msg_count;
> vss->suspended = false;
>
> /*
[ ... ]
> @@ -273,6 +295,16 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
> struct virtio_device *vdev = vss->snd->vdev;
> struct virtio_snd_msg *msg;
> + bool stopped;
> +
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock)
> + stopped = vss->stopped;
> + if (stopped) {
> + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "SID %u: stream release failed\n",
> + vss->sid);
> + substream->runtime->stop_operating = true;
> + return -EBADFD;
> + }
>
> if (!vss->suspended) {
> if (virtsnd_pcm_msg_pending_num(vss)) {
[Severity: High]
Can a failed virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() during system suspend leave the PCM
substream in a permanently unrecoverable state after resume?
During system suspend, do_pcm_suspend() -> snd_pcm_suspend_all() runs:
snd_pcm_do_suspend()
virtsnd_pcm_trigger(substream, SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND)
vss->suspended = true;
vss->stopped = true;
snd_pcm_sync_stop(substream, false)
virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop(substream)
and ignores the return value of snd_pcm_sync_stop(). In
virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop(), allocating or sending VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_RELEASE or
waiting in wait_event_interruptible_timeout() for vss->msg_empty can fail or
be interrupted (for example, returning -ERESTARTSYS when a signal or the
freezer is pending, or -ETIMEDOUT while vss->msg_count > 0). With this
change, virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() leaves vss->stopped = true and re-arms
substream->runtime->stop_operating = true.
Subsequently, virtsnd_freeze() resets the device and deletes the virtqueues
without clearing vss->stopped or vss->msg_count:
virtsnd_freeze()
virtio_reset_device(vdev);
vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
which returns all device-side streams to their initial unconfigured state.
Previously, post-resume snd_pcm_prepare() could recover because
runtime->stop_operating had been cleared by snd_pcm_sync_stop(),
virtsnd_pcm_prepare() did not check vss->stopped, and the vss->suspended
branch skipped the pending-message check, re-sent
VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_SET_PARAMS to the reset device, and reset
vss->msg_count = 0.
With this patch, when userspace calls snd_pcm_prepare() after resume:
1. Because runtime->stop_operating was re-armed, snd_pcm_do_prepare() calls
virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() first. Seeing vss->stopped == true,
virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() sends VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_RELEASE to a freshly reset,
unconfigured stream before VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_SET_PARAMS has been sent, and
waits on vss->msg_empty for a stale vss->msg_count on the recreated empty
virtqueue, timing out with -ETIMEDOUT.
2. Even if virtsnd_pcm_prepare() is reached, checking if (stopped) before
if (!vss->suspended) returns -EBADFD immediately and makes the
vss->suspended recovery path unreachable.
3. Reconfiguring via virtsnd_pcm_hw_params() is also rejected by the new
stopped and msg_count checks, and closing and reopening the substream via
virtsnd_pcm_open() preserves the stale vss->stopped = true (due to
vss->stopped |= !!vss->msg_count), clears vss->suspended = false, and
calls virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() again.
Later commits in this series ("ALSA: virtio: Retain queued messages through
device reset" and "ALSA: virtio: wait through signals for PCM teardown")
detach unused buffers in virtsnd_freeze() and make the control message wait
non-interruptible, but wait_event_interruptible_timeout() in
virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() remains interruptible and virtsnd_freeze() still does
not clear vss->stopped when virtio_reset_device() resets the device-side
stream state. If virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() fails during suspend, post-resume
sync_stop() will still send VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_RELEASE to an unconfigured
stream before SET_PARAMS and block prepare(), hw_params(), and open() if the
reset device rejects RELEASE in its initial state.
[ ... ]
> @@ -393,21 +434,31 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> struct virtio_snd *snd = vss->snd;
> struct virtio_snd_msg *msg;
> unsigned int js = msecs_to_jiffies(virtsnd_msg_timeout_ms);
> + bool need_release;
> int rc;
>
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock) {
> + vss->xfer_enabled = false;
> + need_release = vss->stopped || vss->msg_count;
> + if (need_release)
> + vss->stopped = true;
> + }
> cancel_work_sync(&vss->elapsed_period);
> -
> - if (!vss->stopped)
> + if (!need_release)
> return 0;
>
> msg = virtsnd_pcm_ctl_msg_alloc(vss, VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_RELEASE,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!msg)
> + if (!msg) {
> + substream->runtime->stop_operating = true;
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> rc = virtsnd_ctl_msg_send_sync(snd, msg);
> - if (rc)
> + if (rc) {
> + substream->runtime->stop_operating = true;
> return rc;
> + }
>
> /*
> * The spec states that upon receipt of the RELEASE command "the device
> @@ -421,11 +472,13 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> if (rc <= 0) {
> dev_warn(&snd->vdev->dev, "SID %u: failed to flush I/O queue\n",
> vss->sid);
> + substream->runtime->stop_operating = true;
>
> return !rc ? -ETIMEDOUT : rc;
> }
>
> - vss->stopped = false;
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock)
> + vss->stopped = false;
>
> return 0;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
What happens if virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() succeeds after a failed start, but
the subsequent VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_PREPARE command in virtsnd_pcm_prepare()
fails?
In sound/core/pcm_native.c:snd_pcm_do_start():
err = substream->ops->trigger(substream, SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START);
/* XRUN happened during the start */
if (err == -EPIPE)
__snd_pcm_set_state(substream->runtime, SNDRV_PCM_STATE_XRUN);
return err;
When virtsnd_pcm_trigger(SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START) fails with an error other
than -EPIPE (such as -ENOMEM from virtsnd_pcm_ctl_msg_alloc(), or an error
from virtsnd_pcm_msg_send() or virtsnd_ctl_msg_send_sync()),
substream->runtime->state remains SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PREPARED while
virtsnd_pcm_start_failed() sets vss->stopped = true and
runtime->stop_operating = true.
When userspace then calls snd_pcm_prepare() to recover:
1. snd_pcm_do_prepare() calls snd_pcm_sync_stop(substream, true), which
clears runtime->stop_operating = false and runs virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop().
2. virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() sends VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_RELEASE to the device
(moving the device stream out of the prepared state into the released
state), waits for queued messages to drain, and clears
vss->stopped = false.
3. snd_pcm_do_prepare() then calls virtsnd_pcm_prepare(), which allocates and
sends VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_PREPARE:
msg = virtsnd_pcm_ctl_msg_alloc(vss, VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_PREPARE,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!msg)
return -ENOMEM;
return virtsnd_ctl_msg_send_sync(vss->snd, msg);
If allocating or sending VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_PREPARE fails here,
snd_pcm_do_prepare() returns the error without changing
substream->runtime->state. At that point, the device stream is in the
released (unprepared) state, but substream->runtime->state is still
SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PREPARED, runtime->stop_operating is false, and vss->stopped
is false.
Wouldn't a subsequent SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_START, write(), or
SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR bypass both ALSA's state check and the vss->stopped
check in virtsnd_pcm_trigger(), queueing I/O messages and sending
VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_START to an unprepared device stream?
Note that a later commit in this series ("ALSA: virtio: stage VZ capture and
restart paused streams") handles virtsnd_pcm_dev_prepare() failure when
pause_restart is true, but leaves the standard (!pause_restart) path
unhandled.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027234334.32551-1-mynameisjune111@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 23:43 [PATCH v5 00/11] ALSA: virtio: staged capture and dsnoop recovery Joonho Lee
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] ALSA: virtio: Propagate PCM send failures through ACK Joonho Lee
2026-10-28 0:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ALSA: virtio: Recover PCM state after a failed start Joonho Lee
2026-10-28 0:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ALSA: virtio: Retain queued messages through device reset Joonho Lee
2026-10-28 0:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ALSA: virtio: Keep PCM DMA buffers alive through device ownership Joonho Lee
2026-10-27 23:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ALSA: virtio: Keep control payloads alive through DMA completion Joonho Lee
2026-10-27 23:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ALSA: virtio: wait through signals for PCM teardown Joonho Lee
2026-10-28 0:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] ALSA: virtio: stage VZ capture and restart paused streams Joonho Lee
2026-10-28 0:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] ALSA: virtio: account staged capture reads before RX refill Joonho Lee
2026-10-27 23:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] ALSA: virtio: prioritize staged capture period work Joonho Lee
2026-10-28 0:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] ALSA: pcm: mark stop-threshold accesses for capture policy sampling Joonho Lee
2026-10-27 23:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 23:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] ALSA: virtio-snd: fix dsnoop capture with staged buffers Joonho Lee
2026-10-28 0:13 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-187268@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mynameisjune111@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox