From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stjepan Poljak" <stjepan.poljak@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio_blk: fit max_segments to the virtqueue without indirect descriptors
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2026 16:57:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-192516@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101165307.2557421-3-stjepan.poljak@gmail.com>
> virtblk_read_limits() takes max_segments from the device's seg_max and
> only clamps it to VIRTIO_BLK_MAX_SG_ELEMS - 2, which fits the largest
> virtqueue the spec allows, not the one the device has. Without
> VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC every segment takes a descriptor in the
> ring, next to the header and the status. A device that offers a seg_max
> above its queue size minus two thus lets the block layer build requests
> that can never be added: virtqueue_add_split() warns that the request
> is larger than the ring and returns -ENOSPC, and the hardware queue is
> stopped to wait for descriptors that even an empty ring does not have.
> The I/O hangs.
>
> Seen with a device that offers seg_max 254 on a 128-entry queue without
> indirect descriptors, where the boot hangs loading /sbin/init:
>
> WARNING: drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:688 at virtqueue_add_split+0x6c0/0x850
> ...
> virtqueue_add_sgs+0xd1/0x120
> virtblk_add_req+0xe2/0x140
> virtio_queue_rq+0x79/0x1a0
>
> With seg_max 126 it boots, with 127 it hangs.
>
> Without indirect descriptors, clamp max_segments to the size of the
> smallest virtqueue minus two. The previous commit makes the probe fail
> for a virtqueue smaller than three, so at least one segment is left.
>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5
> Signed-off-by: Stjepan Poljak <stjepan.poljak@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261101165307.2557421-1-stjepan.poljak@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 16:53 [PATCH 0/2] virtio_blk: fit requests to virtqueues without indirect descriptors Stjepan Poljak
2026-11-01 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio_blk: fail the probe when a virtqueue is too small for a request Stjepan Poljak
2026-11-01 17:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-01 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio_blk: fit max_segments to the virtqueue without indirect descriptors Stjepan Poljak
2026-11-01 16:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-02 12:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] virtio_blk: fit requests to virtqueues " Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-192516@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stjepan.poljak@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox