From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793843678; b=QYMb6aQDWAqu5ZlC1IyOuY24x5/v2CQkgyouqpOwa1T8UQwJlatyRxBUelRSmibi8C/Y 4amAQA3Q9vvSRtfVZ2pZWTGwqSCDLH/gsbKIiZUuL1BJMlikk1AoWe6V2AQDm6xOgOc88 f7SPpE36hQmU3hv9JMDAwrwDPUc1PkP+IEm8q8aZ0r/rJkpASHWbjEV93bsURu1Mp/F4s hOQfvM9QSS7F4Ec3twpqoEFdcEACTuXUxNtjtqHNLnmXkG6CvtpdqNUI8jwVC5M16y07S x5IXAIpzY+F165VWKTLKrJRDM6xoXOBF5JLLCBDewUXcJaFxElHnFg/xlvyr1EhsBEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793843678; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=/FnXuf0Gh2cmYxj6gIxvZT6iGCsBsgm6n1k4bbX/G+k=; b=l86rBnWr/7kcqWd15wyuZH35yQs4cbTAO6QqeoPcTjXe0Vy7uEvCYYHPRSTwfJK9BnSf TbWG90oy3gqbfHoMhabLiZvuRYZeW/LSaQapuUum0f+qdM2cvF6Tox5fkiLyfQB8YFjVI cyDNy0AQ5TDmIu3X8E+LzE24cjUt+P0nH/kc7v524VSNOV2F/61XvspeKVCF1Nx9xn2cH Wu63+7B72YbC+JJiTA0/jbCUVS/SG8kYs3SD7MPztv1nhN4RCG7LRCAsq4z8k+F52akyP 80xhA0hRWnmQLSEXNL+CJWujHIqZQcmN25WgkTSTI+rXBN9aePg0U0sVcMr7bGuC4ew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="cOW/5hQj"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20383606A31B for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 01:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=cOW/5hQj Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CB7F1F000C1; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 01:54:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793843677; bh=/FnXuf0Gh2cmYxj6gIxvZT6iGCsBsgm6n1k4bbX/G+k=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=cOW/5hQju3hLaXNKW5f8gIUFHjQjoXcY4bUHmsQRWC+3nAlfIunaZ6+IuIdIokl/c Gh5TywdT5Qp537e9YOWmotrry4C2gSlPOLMPowrolQJSSldBlj/xZTR6kcr74rbFNX YmZKNGhBdK7D+N7+iEYX5Mnw7OSetbcDR9Mde0DwmlXwqNRvmNY6kD+N/62SAQUgA4 4Kdm0ZrH1pVA70cEZ8UhAZCCFd4JawhXu61abnKGfTpEeuOtUIPisX+B8K471zX/Oy PTHUfLgUT0Te/t9HRHs0VTNG5QL+/M5vPY/hHZ2ia6ch4QGu5FeI7bKuUN2DbD2e// //wTc/zu6n1pQ== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/7] vsock: constify the transport in vsock_for_each_connected_socket() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Bobby Eshleman" Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Eugenio Perez" In-Reply-To: <20261103-vsock-guest-ns-v5-1-48179b9b66b8@meta.com> References: <20261103-vsock-guest-ns-v5-0-48179b9b66b8@meta.com> <20261103-vsock-guest-ns-v5-1-48179b9b66b8@meta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 01:54:36 +0000 X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > Allow const transports to be passed too. The function only compares the > pointer against vsk->transport, which is itself const, and never writes > through it. >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103-vsock-gues= t-ns-v5-0-48179b9b66b8@meta.com?part=3D1