From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Francesco Valla" <francesco@valla.it>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: virtio: move teardown to .remove()
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2026 17:49:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-203892@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261108-spi_virtio_remove-v1-1-fda5f0996290@valla.it>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [High] spi: virtio: virtqueue kick before DRIVER_OK in
virtio_spi_restore() [1]
--
commit 30a7d01f20f6ab641d59ca6ce3ddf0209bd0408f
Author: Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
spi: virtio: move teardown to .remove()
This commit replaces devm-managed controller registration and virtqueue
cleanup with an explicit .remove() callback so the virtio device is reset
before the virtio core checks its status during teardown.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-virtio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-virtio.c
> index 26f9711c99b39..2eeb79ff5aa26 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-virtio.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -347,21 +345,26 @@ static int virtio_spi_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(&vdev->dev, ret, "Cannot setup virtqueues\n");
>
> - /* Register cleanup for virtqueues using devm */
> - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&vdev->dev, virtio_spi_del_vq, vdev);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(&vdev->dev, ret, "Cannot register virtqueue cleanup\n");
> -
> virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>
> - /* Use devm version to register controller */
> - ret = devm_spi_register_controller(&vdev->dev, ctrl);
> - if (ret)
> + ret = spi_register_controller(ctrl);
> + if (ret) {
> + virtio_spi_del_vq(vdev);
> return dev_err_probe(&vdev->dev, ret, "Cannot register controller\n");
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void virtio_spi_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct spi_controller *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev);
> +
> + spi_unregister_controller(ctrl);
> +
> + virtio_spi_del_vq(vdev);
> +}
> +
> static int virtio_spi_freeze(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can virtio_spi_restore()
kick the virtqueue before VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK is set [1]?
drivers/spi/spi-virtio.c:virtio_spi_restore() {
...
ret = virtio_spi_find_vqs(vdev->priv);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "problem starting vqueue (%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
ret = spi_controller_resume(ctrl);
...
}
Unlike virtio_spi_probe(), which calls virtio_device_ready() before
exposing the controller, virtio_spi_restore() calls
spi_controller_resume() without marking the device ready first:
CPU0 CPU1 (kworker)
virtio_spi_restore()
virtio_spi_find_vqs()
spi_controller_resume()
virtio_spi_transfer_one()
virtqueue_kick() <-- before DRIVER_OK
virtio_device_ready()
Unblocking the SPI message pump wakes the kworker to process queued
transfers and kick the virtqueue before the resume path returns to set
DRIVER_OK, violating the virtio specification and risking dropped SPI
transfers or a broken device state on resume. Calling
virtio_device_ready(vdev) before spi_controller_resume(ctrl) would avoid
this.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-82cf02b8-4add-4c6f-b6da-ae25c86bd2bf
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261108-spi_virtio_remove-v1-1-fda5f0996290@valla.it?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-08 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 17:41 [PATCH] spi: virtio: move teardown to .remove() Francesco Valla
2026-11-08 17:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 0:58 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-203892@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=francesco@valla.it \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox