From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michal Luczaj" <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vhost/vsock: Fix socket state constant
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 10:34:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-212625@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-transport-reset-state-fix-v1-1-5698375f52a9@rbox.co>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] vhost/vsock: vhost_vsock_reset_orphans() TCP_CLOSE breaks
vsock_connect()
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [High] vhost/vsock: data race in vhost_vsock_reset_orphans() [1]
--
commit 5aff0946f70c88424d509989526e2bc91c501e
Author: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
vhost/vsock: Fix socket state constant
This commit updates vhost_vsock_reset_orphans() to set sk->sk_state to
TCP_CLOSE instead of SS_UNCONNECTED when resetting orphaned connections.
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index 88a310390eb0a..fd224f7681d92 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static void vhost_vsock_reset_orphans(struct sock *sk)
>
> sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE);
> vsk->peer_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
> - sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> + sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
> sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET;
> sk_error_report(sk);
> }
[Severity: High]
Can setting sk->sk_state to TCP_CLOSE here cause vsock_connect() to reset
sock->state to SS_UNCONNECTED while vsk remains in vsock_connected_table?
Previously, SS_UNCONNECTED (1) happened to match TCP_ESTABLISHED (1), so
vsock_connect() treated the socket as once-established. With TCP_CLOSE, a
vhost device release racing with a completing connection can hit the error
path in vsock_connect():
CPU0 CPU1
vsock_connect()
release_sock(sk)
schedule_timeout()
virtio_transport_recv_connecting()
sk->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED
sock->state = SS_CONNECTED
vsock_insert_connected(vsk)
vhost_vsock_dev_release()
...
vhost_vsock_reset_orphans(sk)
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE
sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET
lock_sock(sk)
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ||
sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSING) <-- false
...
err = sock_error(sk)
if (err)
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED <-- still in vsock_connected_table
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:vsock_connect() {
...
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ||
sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSING) {
err = 0;
goto out_wait;
}
...
err = sock_error(sk);
if (err) {
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
}
}
Because sock->state is reset to SS_UNCONNECTED while vsk is still linked in
vsock_connected_table, a subsequent connect() on the same socket can
reassign its transport or, if shutdown() clears SOCK_DONE and a new
VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RESPONSE arrives, call vsock_insert_connected(vsk) a second
time and corrupt vsock_connected_table. Setting sk->sk_state to
TCP_CLOSING instead (or checking sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE) in
vsock_connect()) would preserve the once-established check.
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but vhost_vsock_reset_orphans()
modifies sk->sk_flags, vsk->peer_shutdown, sk->sk_state, and sk->sk_err
under vsock_table_lock without holding lock_sock(sk) [1]. Concurrent
socket operations such as vsock_connect(), sendmsg(), or recvmsg() holding
the socket lock can race with these updates and observe inconsistent socket
state.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-f1ccca0e-e7ae-4926-a24d-72f61680c524
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-transport-reset-state-fix-v1-1-5698375f52a9@rbox.co?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 10:34 [PATCH net] vhost/vsock: Fix socket state constant Michal Luczaj
2026-11-12 10:36 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-12 10:52 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-11-13 8:44 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-11-13 10:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-212625@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox