* [tip:locking/core] locking/x86: Tweak the comment about use of wmb() for IO
[not found] <1453921746-16178-4-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
@ 2016-01-29 11:32 ` tip-bot for Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: tip-bot for Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2016-01-29 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: dave, dvlasenk, akpm, brgerst, dbueso, peterz, andreyknvl, mst,
linux-kernel, virtualization, luto, bp, bp, luto, hpa, tglx,
paulmck, torvalds, mingo
Commit-ID: 57d9b1b43433a6ba7267c80b87d8e8f6e86edceb
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/57d9b1b43433a6ba7267c80b87d8e8f6e86edceb
Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 19:02:44 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:40:10 +0100
locking/x86: Tweak the comment about use of wmb() for IO
On x86, we *do* still use the non-NOP rmb()/wmb() for IO barriers,
but even that is generally questionable.
Leave them around as historial unless somebody can point to a
case where they care about the performance, but tweak the
comment so people don't think they are strictly required in all
cases.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453921746-16178-4-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
index a291745..bfb28ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
/*
* Force strict CPU ordering.
- * And yes, this is required on UP too when we're talking
+ * And yes, this might be required on UP too when we're talking
* to devices.
*/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-01-29 11:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1453921746-16178-4-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
2016-01-29 11:32 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/x86: Tweak the comment about use of wmb() for IO tip-bot for Michael S. Tsirkin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).