From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: smntov@gmail.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id ddf4d319 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 09:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f175.google.com (mail-wr0-f175.google.com [209.85.128.175]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 402edd6a for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 09:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z73so18242481wrb.0 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 03:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Message-ID: <1523786895.1990.5.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Sharing peer data From: ST To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:08:15 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 01:15 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi Luiz, > > You could indeed arrange for something like this, either directly -- > if both IPs are accessible Which IPs do you mean here? Public IPs or private VPN IPs (i.e. those defined within WireGuard configuration)? I got an idea how to do that using SFTP... I'll write about it in a separate email... Just one question: let's assume B and C got the required information about each other's IPs/public keys from A. Will they now communicate directly without relying on A in whatever way?... It is important to know for the case when A is a server with metered paid traffic... Will the communication between B and C affect the traffic of A or not? Thank you!