From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E0EF9D0D6 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:49:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e7d9ee49; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id d5f582c3 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC7660018; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A88CC19425; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:44:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776181447; bh=GOEHN8D4mrXLesq3Uxwxg1mrKL7Yav8u1R6lnIlIxfs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lG3NAFvp4uV/avU7Keluh5lA044kTwGigw0dtOcBFsT/SkWas1n5pMgD1fD3QgWZO T5FgsgvIdFbVWp0Yo3F+gYIuuohxZjGOqjFFKei2sD2aNLTKSk4c31G2OeSnW5PORL I7XuhwVrlaUQSyKMLJpYpOgwytC5MKrODYcI7uDn/PpssWe4JWbhJehzfzrSEvgyiX dapobBBO1yB9Y882/R+KSYYP22kgMIQZCoDy+8i2QrI9r5Gu/m+FS51PjTwlfPTgEL KWDxEEAmcej3DOx46/LCH6VE1sD/qtGm18rOlxnepUioDWDCLiSeYCKhX4JnWUImDu swVJJKmHkEFVw== Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:44:06 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Shardul Bankar , kuniyu@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, janak@mpiric.us, kalpan.jani@mpiricsoftware.com, shardulsb08@gmail.com, syzbot+f2fbf7478a35a94c8b7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wireguard: device: use exit_rtnl callback instead of manual rtnl_lock in pre_exit Message-ID: <20260414084406.779336af@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260413151232.1004611-1-shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com> <20260414081824.0edf6113@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:40:03 +0200 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 5:18=E2=80=AFPM Jakub Kicinski = wrote: > > > > On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:28:37 +0200 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: =20 > > > Thanks. Applied to the wireguard tree, and also added the missing > > > __net_exit and __read_mostly annotations in the process. =20 > > > > Hi Jason, while we have you - do you have a PR for us for wireguard? > > We're going to be sending the net-next PR later today.. =20 >=20 > Sent! Thanks!=20 (I'll apply in a couple of hours once the CI had its way with it.)