From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28649C54756 for ; Thu, 22 May 2025 04:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 2fc5a10c; Thu, 22 May 2025 04:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id b660cfdc (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Thu, 22 May 2025 04:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-742c035f2afso3189625b3a.2 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 21:34:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1747888493; x=1748493293; darn=lists.zx2c4.com; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Dky3FIQgBX8aNP78AifCGTL6ccyTVByog03wzzXO4zc=; b=iJND7X/6ctqt6oBcvgzwOx2prXZERTBjM01W8W6a+Euy1Br2Vl+FaQpQQn3RplMJbq Lii4s4rWG2VjYk14e2wXElFkqG5g+thE9aPunv+YlzxhhNrZUJrRy2Xs8cZkeR9GTNs4 QhpajCTTT0b3G3r7oNLYraMzFpGEAvneZQ2sP23KL8+JTUDqhtQrd4DPIIUd5p0Y5JQl LnKoh8THjshU0Pfax8fN12fNPZ4ocRxjw1O5z20i62zCg9b/+olcq7jACi6j7oyiLYMx Ut5QRYaY+EjTsAlLeUdtpsHN2K/b2y9lIzfl7IF9ZkO/DR8U83Kql2gGLfuZNGSIpGfy uEfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747888493; x=1748493293; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Dky3FIQgBX8aNP78AifCGTL6ccyTVByog03wzzXO4zc=; b=bwRvXHV1/Kgkf3EdMyr8m8a6TkCM51WhbjKcIrwKnLzyR+cOFIOEpCtDf+ZAh4iZYj ty/Tpl+w5+bOTM2HNIbX2o6rZNaM2zD+N4EGUil75duF4EpGNW7mxkcZaiGfbiJBKQN8 fbbVMfcOgFQI0cHZ1GagZX6+/izlVOh2Q/DERW6jwkHnnKwaWX0VmmQkg5fBe6qDZ60A S9KN4QaYD4qyHWqc4VHDD/qIsAmOfCknLkrL/UmpPN0qKTIVRSTssrR/jKNic/a8MNZM 6bEUf/nnGG1gCDkZwYSHFbD3Cm8CRq2jnoGHXrwVv3WQAwLOyvMazP8cQdRfq2X3MSLA mUEQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVf8l2Cn5hrwW0slSG8ag2AytSxePYjITsbNircrxTjPwWRw4ipt4udSoV0giS1FwtMbiT4C1uUg0w=@lists.zx2c4.com X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyXJ6PL4+Zhl/8IuelHerRR7sT//+h7lNr3vSfEaF5OBXAFTKw5 wEDbubNE5EFLkifghP0inYN5l8aAYAIBfuWOt5cQLAvvJAm7goRe35A+ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuRohw/F66c6oSEu7IozbpRhW5W7CKO6cztTrRz9ESp8WinPdiYGnpqAchYoJN QagLHIapX2R195QLT90+iKvXhPeIu20R2ytKQHSH93kh1pFCHhJ6V1aBzrKvJYZ0rb2igwr2cyM QopPcsKtIeBHTO4HI+qNmlXPGcIkBWpeXrSKUM8vPaHAZYqlalVqaT4hlLXlT1/dElpMc1C8P8r J0oAk5VqQA0EBYYz5n2Nn6Xhlb5dFOeEYmxlvgH6Ab10bRvmfvwmli3KHYigmbhhitX6gfLMor5 WuGXAzUmb9NeM/C/OxQp6ag23ffjY30V5d3QF/vYOEDjPw4GZYSAQPCi X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGh3Q2clU7Qyx5JWq+TxnZeFNMMnKfZXa7ry6Qxs7rCrVIzwW2jPAJC0kCMqhcqM6mA3QmumQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3993:b0:1f5:56fe:b437 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-216219b13demr42046834637.32.1747888492887; Wed, 21 May 2025 21:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fedora ([209.132.188.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-b26eb0a9893sm10518551a12.72.2025.05.21.21.34.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 May 2025 21:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 04:34:44 +0000 From: Hangbin Liu To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski , Shuah Khan , "David S. Miller" , Simon Horman , Phil Sutter , Florian Westphal , Petr Mladek , Yoann Congal , wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 net-next 0/2] wireguard: selftests: use nftables for testing Message-ID: References: <20250408081652.1330-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250408081652.1330-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi Jason, I just saw this patch set is not applied to wireguard tree. Did I missed any change request? Should I repost the patch? BTW, what prefix should I use when the target is wireguard next? [PATCH wireguard-next] ? Thanks Hangbin On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:16:50AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote: > This patch set convert the wireguard selftest to nftables, as iptables is > deparated and nftables is the default framework of most releases. > > v6: fix typo in patch 1/2. Update the description (Phil Sutter) > v5: remove the counter in nft rules and link nft statically (Jason A. Donenfeld) > v4: no update, just re-send > v3: drop iptables directly (Jason A. Donenfeld) > Also convert to using nft for qemu testing (Jason A. Donenfeld) > v2: use one nft table for testing (Phil Sutter) > > Hangbin Liu (2): > wireguard: selftests: convert iptables to nft > wireguard: selftests: update to using nft for qemu test > > tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh | 29 +++++++++------ > .../testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/Makefile | 36 ++++++++++++++----- > .../selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config | 7 ++-- > 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.46.0 >