From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217] helo=sipsolutions.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Tfwau-0000CX-W2 for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:47:45 +0000 Message-ID: <1354643287.9608.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> From: Johannes Berg Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:48:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1352713865.9525.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1352713865.9525.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] regdb: allow 40 MHz on world roaming channels 12/13 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: wireless-regdb-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org Cc: mcgrof@gmail.com List-ID: On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 10:51 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg > > When in world roaming mode, allow 40 MHz to be used > on channels 12 and 13 so that an AP that is, e.g., > using HT40+ on channel 9 (in the UK) can be used. Well, hold on.. this can't possibly work now :( This is what happens when Luis and I disagree ... I thought the bandwidth in a given section means the bandwidth that can be used from this section, Luis implemented it to mean that a channel overlapping any part of that section can only use that much bandwidth. Note sure which was intended? johannes _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb