From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217] helo=sipsolutions.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ti0Va-0001lk-Dy for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:22:47 +0000 Message-ID: <1355134918.9857.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> From: Johannes Berg Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:21:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1573921.0GjqNuABMd@lx-vladimir> References: <8774585.BvFN3Opv12@lx-vladimir> <1573921.0GjqNuABMd@lx-vladimir> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: add regulatory rule for ETSI members on 60gHz band List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: wireless-regdb-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Vladimir Kondratiev Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linville@tuxdriver.com List-ID: On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:45 +0200, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: > For the 60gHz band, regulation defined in the "Etsi En 302 567" > http://docsfiles.com/pdf_final_draft_etsi_en_302_567.html > +country AD: > + # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 > + (57240 - 65880 @ 2160), (N/A, 40), NO-OUTDOOR > + (57240 - 65880 @ 2160), (N/A, 25) There doesn't seem to be a bandwidth limitation in the rules, should we really put one into the database? johannes _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb