From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49] helo=sipsolutions.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YhjXb-0007GV-HU for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:57:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1428951396.2355.15.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Johannes Berg Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:56:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150413162317.GA21761@ubuntu-xps13> References: <000601d075fe$e10e0600$a32a1200$@acksys.fr> <20150413162317.GA21761@ubuntu-xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [RFC] [PATCH] crda: enforce ETSI CAC timer of 600s on the weather band List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "wireless-regdb" Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Seth Forshee Cc: Jean-Pierre Tosoni , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 11:23 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Pierre Tosoni wrote: > > A really weird patch that splits the U-NII-2e band into 1, 2 or 3 > > sub-bands to enforce a CAC time of 10 minutes in the range 5600-5650 MHz. > > Wrong maintainer / list. CRDA patches should be directed to Luis and the > linux-wireless list (feel free to Cc wireless-regdb if you like). However, I'm not convinced that this actually *belongs* into the crda code? That seems like the wrong approach - shouldn't these rules be captured in the database? We do have AUTO-BW now so it should be possible, no? And if the timings aren't captured in the db.txt file they really should be. johannes _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb