From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1asgFv-0001NM-By for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:44:36 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n3so56231942wmn.0 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:44:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=jK8HyFDK7RAqrvoS7lWUYcKBNBcgycVJmR2vTMKA96I=; b=iLxGdmTe4PdP5BRiUM0vdRCuEZQ96axrxS1t/nSbmMhI+MOKuagxjEwDLAMJP6jt3K 31g7laJnXkfIne9rTKFGX9Bk42gIyBaNlmnbbqAUgRtf1rS06PL1RtF6RuynqkBCiBSv wcMNc/7bLKVJlRtl3ER8DbFn8akLR2G/pL6g39/BvCj4RrdCjRKM9zdRZF5fc9er3/qM m0wkKl9CNr8Eup8R9UOx5z/k7k7pR8PfFwUcZsXdE5NIBbKQZVm5xBqd5kyQXYGX/t3M OCaGY8LWZ2zDgdPvIqeTV4RnUqYJa7OYKV9HhIuOEFXZk9j7gUH4tmJgTW4Bba10I/GR 0U/Q== From: Petko Bordjukov Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 03:44:02 +0300 Message-Id: <1461113043-30102-1-git-send-email-bordjukov@gmail.com> Subject: [wireless-regdb] Updates for the regulatory rules for Bulgaria List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "wireless-regdb" Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org Cc: bordjukov@gmail.com List-ID: Hello, There seem to be discrepancies between the current regulatory rules for Bulgaria (BG) and what has been mandated by the Communications Regulation Commission. First, the maximum e.i.r.p. for all the bands in the 5170 MHz to 5710 MHz range seems to be 3 dBm lower than what's permitted by the CRC. This change was introduced with commit 236efecf6685f917baa26aa0108b1eebce910bf3 and is attributed to QCA's regulatory team's efforts. I'd be grateful if the QCA regulatory team reviews my patch just in case I'm missing something. Here's what I'm getting from the CRC's EU-harmonized frequency list[1]: WDTS 2400-2483.5 MHz 100 mW maximum e.i.r.p. 10 mW/MHz maximum e.i.r.p. spectral density WAS/RLANs 5470-5725 MHz 1 W maximum mean e.i.r.p. 50 mW/MHz maximum spectral density of the mean e.i.r.p. Comment: The devices must use TPC that ensures average reduction of 3 dB of the maximum transmit power of the system. In case TPC is not used, the maximum mean e.i.r.p and maximum density of the mean e.i.r.p. are lowered by 3 dB. WAS/RLANs 5150-5250 MHz 200 mW maximum mean e.i.r.p. 10 mW/MHz maximum spectral density of the mean e.i.r.p. WAS/RLANs 5250-5350 MHz 200 mW maximum mean e.i.r.p. 10 mW/MHz maximum spectral density of the mean e.i.r.p. Comment: The devices must use TPC that ensures average reduction of 3 dB of the maximum transmit power of the system. In case TPC is not used, the maximum mean e.i.r.p and maximum density of the mean e.i.r.p. are lowered by 3 dB. Second, the CRC mandates that the 60 GHz RLAN frequencies are only for indoor use. As a side note, the last version of the ETSI EN 302 561 standard mandates that the appropriate National Administrations are to state the maximum permitted output power, which as I see it is in conflict with the current state of most of the regdb, at least concerning the EU countries. [1] http://crc.bg/files/_bg/Spisak_09-06-2015.pdf - Regards, P. _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb