From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YEbcd-00020I-11 for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:37:52 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qca.qualcomm.com; i=@qca.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1422009471; x=1453545471; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=o4PhlAeU+9PgqeMhzAfRDngE455BiZFKdI792iE259k=; b=cCPH80U/6ClXRImQ6SDAf1cmZtHo79jBhNi5Hj5WqLLd+hAwNlzxvPur pR1Co9OdJBeC8X3QwjHB5gch0f6+DshgyMSNZfXSDogN6j0SDXlw1WTFb uIfBMlBLK2CVYPJi+r5HY1mD9E3TUdQbvAKtDqcoSVUV47zDBvmbPk7Jc E=; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:37:20 +0200 From: Jouni Malinen Message-ID: <20150123103720.GA7274@jouni.qca.qualcomm.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Add back regulatory rules for US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "wireless-regdb" Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Daiwei Li Cc: "wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org" List-ID: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:42:12PM -0800, Daiwei Li wrote: > We've found that our devices can't seem to operate on certain > frequencies (e.g. 5660MHz) being used by access points like the Apple > Airport Extreme and Asus RT-AC68U. I did a git bisect and found that > 31dc1c5eca29d039ac8f26340defe44bd7e497c1 removed that band amongst > others. A more recent [1] FCC source implies that these frequencies > should be usable with DFS. > > Does anyone know the source for the commit that removed these frequencies from? I'm not sure what the exact rationale for that part of the commit was. > @@ -1125,6 +1125,8 @@ country US: DFS-FCC > (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (30) > (5170 - 5250 @ 80), (17), AUTO-BW > (5250 - 5330 @ 80), (23), DFS, AUTO-BW > + (5490 - 5600 @ 80), (23), DFS, AUTO-BW > + (5650 - 5710 @ 40), (23), DFS, AUTO-BW > (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) AUTO-BW does not seem to make much sense here since neither new range has immediately neighboring ranges with different flags. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb