From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=SVLWKtTkZgitNnh6q9vEsLHUw6Gnvhc8jOD6CLUEHSM=; b=K2COTrpLzocVBs 6QDjoM80EN2H1uoDEvh3vKfCzvciStnnBTp+QMVPRXfPC4ElyLKh8KQaDtsCW5g7kPyXUssVE5nZ3 eirBP9RM2i4Qygv+QNDBrprOFqUmmjLqqildv4Z5WpK5xYzrA3vtsD4MZbtOYgX5sRVu9Rbia3u44 bFiX0DcAX+bv80F64f49LfVcPT3NyP3CYKRkY3wYHCj2pf8r7k+gAF+3f78+2hK5Vo6oD64ORm9uL VwdwKReSl3XJOzi+dg7E5/TSBx/UFKBiqVGdzsACRvXiwjFIaEQDm33BU1Q/ylZDbqKaMREQYj1nY 3STbmF5MtNrzBbLlK7QQ==; Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iPRF3-0000mk-Kt for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:08:59 +0000 Received: from mail-yb1-f199.google.com ([209.85.219.199]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPRF2-0000ZH-AP for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:08:56 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-f199.google.com with SMTP id w13so10518815ybj.8 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:08:53 -0500 From: Seth Forshee Message-ID: <20191029130853.GN30813@ubuntu-xps13> References: <20190907235636.GA8256@ubuntu-xps13> <39933518-6a65-fab3-4a66-8f44fc319d57@streamunlimited.com> <76f464e9-8806-ecbf-2dc8-67bb4190ecc7@streamunlimited.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <76f464e9-8806-ecbf-2dc8-67bb4190ecc7@streamunlimited.com> Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Create entry for united European region List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: "wireless-regdb" Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Emil Petersky Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:55:07AM +0200, Emil Petersky wrote: > Create entry for united European region, as usage of frequency bands > is harmonized over EU and almost all CEPT countries as well. > > All EU countries and almost all CEPT countries accepted decisions > 2005/513/EC (5GHz RLAN, EN 301 893) > and 2006/771/EC (amended by 2008/432/EC, Short-Range Devices, EN 300 440) >  EU decision 2005/513/EC: > https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02005D0513-20070213 >  EU decision 2006/771/EC: > https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02008D0432-20080611 > Harmonized CEPT countries: > https://www.ecodocdb.dk/download/25c41779-cd6e/Rec7003e.pdf > Such decision make sense to create united European region (EU) in regdb > > United region for EU in regdb will enable much easier handling of proper > wlan parameters on embedded devices sold across the Europe. I'm a little curious about this one. I do agree that it would simplify things, but is an EU contry code something standard that wireless APs generally will advertise, or that clients will understand? And we do still have all the individual countries to maintain. Maybe it would make sense to define an EU region as rules that countries could inherit, and then have rules for any deviations from the common EU rules. Thoughts? Thanks, Seth _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb