wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Marcos Alano]

Hi,

The rules for Brazil were based on this normative 
https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680, 
as mentioned in the comments of the entry.

This January came out a newer normative 
https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,

It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
(5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
Should change for, at least:
(5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't 
work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.

I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more 
granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.

Thanks,
-- 
Marcos Alano

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Marcos Alano]

> Hi,
> 
> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative https:// 
> informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680, 
> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
> 
> This January came out a newer normative https:// 
> informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
> 
> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
> Should change for, at least:
> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't 
> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
> 
> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more 
> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
> 
> Thanks,

Hi, I created a patch to solve that.

 From be7b64050691e85490f8adf1a39dd63a4c2192a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:07:00 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on
  6GHz

Change rules for 6GHz in Brazil, removing `NO-IR` and adding
`AUTO-BW` so the 6GHz band can be used.

Add the relevant normative in comments.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com>
---
  db.txt | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
index e331d4f..3b0adbb 100644
--- a/db.txt
+++ b/db.txt
@@ -321,8 +321,8 @@ country BO: DFS-JP

  # Source:
  # 
https://www.gov.br/anatel/pt-br/regulado/radiofrequencia/radiacao-restrita
-# 
https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680
-# 
https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2017/1139-ato-14448
+# 
https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772
+# 
https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915
  country BR: DFS-FCC
  	(2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (30)
  	# The next three ranges have been reduced by 3dB, could be increased
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ country BR: DFS-FCC
  	(5250 - 5350 @ 80), (27), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
  	(5470 - 5725 @ 160), (27), DFS, AUTO-BW
  	(5725 - 5850 @ 80), (30), AUTO-BW
-	(5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
+	(5925 - 7125 @ 320), (30), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
  	# EIRP=40dBm (43dBm peak)
  	(57000 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)

-- 
2.49.0

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
>
> This January came out a newer normative
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
>
> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
> Should change for, at least:
> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.

Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
or comments apply to your argument?

Thanks
ChenYu

> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marcos Alano
>
>

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Marcos Alano]

On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
>> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
>>
>> This January came out a newer normative
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
>>
>> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
>> Should change for, at least:
>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
>> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
>> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
> 
> Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
> or comments apply to your argument?

https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915: 
in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.
https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772: 
You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you 
understand that is not necessary.

Marcos.


> 
> Thanks
> ChenYu
> 
>> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
>> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Marcos Alano
>>
>>

-- 
Marcos Alano

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
> >> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
> >> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
> >>
> >> This January came out a newer normative
> >> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
> >>
> >> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
> >> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
> >> Should change for, at least:
> >> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
> >> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
> >> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
> >
> > Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
> > or comments apply to your argument?
>
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.

This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.

> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
> understand that is not necessary.

This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".

The requirements I were able to find are:

https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306

ChenYu

> Marcos.
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > ChenYu
> >
> >> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
> >> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Marcos Alano
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Marcos Alano
>

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Marcos Alano]

On 26/06/2025 06:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
Hi,
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
>>>> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
>>>>
>>>> This January came out a newer normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
>>>>
>>>> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
>>>> Should change for, at least:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
>>>> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
>>>> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
>>>
>>> Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
>>> or comments apply to your argument?
>>
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
>> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.
> 
> This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
> and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.
> 
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
>> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
>> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
>> understand that is not necessary.
> 
> This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
> Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
> for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".
> 
> The requirements I were able to find are:
> 
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306
> 
I understand. The problem is: with NO-IR set, we can't configure an AP, 
since the AP is the initial radiator.

So we just could remove NO-IR so we can create and use APs in this range?

In this case, I will create a v3 of the patch that just removes NO-IR 
and keeps the documentation links as is.

Please let me know what you think.

Marcos.
> ChenYu
> 
>> Marcos.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> ChenYu
>>>
>>>> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
>>>> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> Marcos Alano
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos Alano
>>

-- 
Marcos Alano

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Marcos Alano]

On 26/06/2025 06:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
>>>> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
>>>>
>>>> This January came out a newer normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
>>>>
>>>> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
>>>> Should change for, at least:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
>>>> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
>>>> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
>>>
>>> Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
>>> or comments apply to your argument?
>>
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
>> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.
> 
> This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
> and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.
> 
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
>> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
>> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
>> understand that is not necessary.
> 
> This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
> Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
> for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".
> 
> The requirements I were able to find are:
> 
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306
> 
Based on that, what should be the maximum dBm? I saw it mentions 30dBm 
but also 24dBm.
> ChenYu
> 
>> Marcos.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> ChenYu
>>>
>>>> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
>>>> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> Marcos Alano
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos Alano
>>

-- 
Marcos Alano

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Marcos Alano]

On 26/06/2025 06:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
>>>> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
>>>>
>>>> This January came out a newer normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
>>>>
>>>> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
>>>> Should change for, at least:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
>>>> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
>>>> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
>>>
>>> Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
>>> or comments apply to your argument?
>>
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
>> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.
> 
> This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
> and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.
> 
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
>> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
>> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
>> understand that is not necessary.
> 
> This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
> Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
> for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".
> 
> The requirements I were able to find are:
> 
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306
> 
> ChenYu

I created a v3 patch that updates the comments with the new normative 
you found, removes the NO-IR so a AP can work correctly, and changed the 
maximum power from 12 to 27, since for APs it seems to mention 30dBm, 
but I considered TPC like the other frequencies.

> 
>> Marcos.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> ChenYu
>>>
>>>> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
>>>> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> Marcos Alano
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos Alano
>>

-- 
Marcos Alano

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 5:56 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 26/06/2025 06:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
> >>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
> >>>> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
> >>>>
> >>>> This January came out a newer normative
> >>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
> >>>>
> >>>> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
> >>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
> >>>> Should change for, at least:
> >>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
> >>>> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
> >>>> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
> >>>
> >>> Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
> >>> or comments apply to your argument?
> >>
> >> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
> >> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.
> >
> > This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
> > and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.
> >
> >> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
> >> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
> >> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
> >> understand that is not necessary.
> >
> > This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
> > Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
> > for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".
> >
> > The requirements I were able to find are:
> >
> > https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306
> >
> > ChenYu
>
> I created a v3 patch that updates the comments with the new normative
> you found, removes the NO-IR so a AP can work correctly, and changed the
> maximum power from 12 to 27, since for APs it seems to mention 30dBm,
> but I considered TPC like the other frequencies.

You failed to consider the power spectral density requirement. As I
mentioned in a previous reply, the requirement for clients is -1 dBm/MHz,
which at the smallest channel width, translates to a power limit of around
12 dBm. The original value is correct.

The database in its current form simply does not have the capability to
model things like PSD or AP vs client device specificity.

If the regulations require NO-IR for clients, then we cannot remove it
just so that APs can work. See [1] for the same discussion for US 6 GHz.

Sorry.

ChenYu

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/wireless-regdb/14ab2a58e7603047354a17b2c980c143992a6782.camel@sipsolutions.net/

> >
> >> Marcos.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> ChenYu
> >>>
> >>>> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
> >>>> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> --
> >>>> Marcos Alano
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marcos Alano
> >>
>
> --
> Marcos Alano
>

Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Marcos Alano]

On 26/06/2025 07:05, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 5:56 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26/06/2025 06:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
>>>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
>>>>>> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This January came out a newer normative
>>>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
>>>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
>>>>>> Should change for, at least:
>>>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
>>>>>> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
>>>>>> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
>>>>>
>>>>> Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
>>>>> or comments apply to your argument?
>>>>
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
>>>> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.
>>>
>>> This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
>>> and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.
>>>
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
>>>> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
>>>> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
>>>> understand that is not necessary.
>>>
>>> This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
>>> Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
>>> for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".
>>>
>>> The requirements I were able to find are:
>>>
>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306
>>>
>>> ChenYu
>>
>> I created a v3 patch that updates the comments with the new normative
>> you found, removes the NO-IR so a AP can work correctly, and changed the
>> maximum power from 12 to 27, since for APs it seems to mention 30dBm,
>> but I considered TPC like the other frequencies.
> 
> You failed to consider the power spectral density requirement. As I
> mentioned in a previous reply, the requirement for clients is -1 dBm/MHz,
> which at the smallest channel width, translates to a power limit of around
> 12 dBm. The original value is correct.
> 
> The database in its current form simply does not have the capability to
> model things like PSD or AP vs client device specificity.
> 
> If the regulations require NO-IR for clients, then we cannot remove it
> just so that APs can work. See [1] for the same discussion for US 6 GHz.
> 
Where can I check if the regulation requires NO-IR? I couldn't find any 
mention to this.

> Sorry.
> 
> ChenYu
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/wireless-regdb/14ab2a58e7603047354a17b2c980c143992a6782.camel@sipsolutions.net/
> 
>>>
>>>> Marcos.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> ChenYu
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
>>>>>> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Marcos Alano
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marcos Alano
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos Alano
>>

-- 
Marcos Alano