Re: [PATCH] kselftest docs: remove reference to obsolete/archived wiki

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

On 6/18/26 02:41, Brett Sheffield wrote:
>> On 6/17/26 19:03, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 6/17/26 17:57, Rafael Passos wrote:
>>>> This link in the docs point to a wiki that is no longer active.
>>>>
>>>> The wiki was moved to archive.kernel.org, and there is a warning:
>>>> "OBSOLETE CONTENT This wiki has been archived and the content is
>>>> no longer updated."
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael Passos <rafael@rcpassos.me>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>    Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst | 5 -----
>>>>    1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst
>>>> index d7bfe320338c..64c0ec7428a2 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst
>>>> @@ -15,11 +15,6 @@ able to run that test on an older kernel. Hence, it is important to keep
>>>>    code that can still test an older kernel and make sure it skips the test
>>>>    gracefully on newer releases.
>>>> -You can find additional information on Kselftest framework, how to
>>>> -write new tests using the framework on Kselftest wiki:
>>>> -
>>>> -https://kselftest.wiki.kernel.org/
>>>> -
>>>>    On some systems, hot-plug tests could hang forever waiting for cpu and
>>>>    memory to be ready to be offlined. A special hot-plug target is created
>>>>    to run the full range of hot-plug tests. In default mode, hot-plug tests run
>>>
>>>
>>> Looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
>>
>> Jon,
>>
>> I can take this through kselftest tree as I usually do.
>>
>> thanks,
>> -- Shuah
> 
> Hi Shuah, Jon et al,
> 
> I've been trying to get the same change merged since August 2025:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20250824075007.13901-2-bacs@librecast.net/
> 
> resent in January:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20260115172817.7120-1-bacs@librecast.net/
> 
> It's great that this trivial fix is finally getting merged, but can someone
> explain why this patch was accepted in preference to the one I sent in August?
> 

Brett,

My apologies  for not taking your patch earlier. Considering the effort
you put in with a re-sending the patch and following up here, it is
only fair for me to take yours instead. Hope it will apply cleanly on
top of kselftest-next

Rafael, I am going to take Brett;s patch instead of yours.

Apologies to both of you for the mix up.

thanks,
-- Shuah