From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp153-163.sina.com.cn (smtp153-163.sina.com.cn [61.135.153.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB66435A83 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=61.135.153.163 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783513492; cv=none; b=ItgRsTSJLBJlCf6roPQJ3o3VqBvIBaHK4shBezEsU8B4/oxfIhVChJJeaj3P5cPR+J8Lfc90Y1jjUWKgT+HS4/4Zhlk+l5RpARlW0GHutc/mIOUFO46RBwBRBo96G8K1o/TWY+PG9jnynypHiWeSI5zIxoHl3B2c7RVQdITZZpk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783513492; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AKyd0M7PX0+Nq7kB/sdVqHTbpIOw2fdLhtT49aNZTt0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=KExRU8QlZhDR+W1AuYP88eI3GeJ7FsDRyiv0ooEwcnBBEKyOBJe3hEcx4xIhlEDW8nFqJXl16C6/usqQ7windHZh6LTSqcgVJ+EtvMQ3ZTelSBuNBEKvGKDAHQdQ0ue6E3dl0Kmo7toZoepm9CD3nSDPZUcxq6lD8RHlloWvHBM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sina.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sina.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sina.com header.i=@sina.com header.b=Qvue5fYP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=61.135.153.163 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sina.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sina.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sina.com header.i=@sina.com header.b="Qvue5fYP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sina.com; s=201208; t=1783513485; bh=mB6wN4edvu/uMC5EBoKZ1W1jvPayVvdoqYY59Yp1gfU=; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID; b=Qvue5fYPF2NUyiZvVww6fcXuGmIW5/Qx9g0Y0V8N/RxtBc1vkvey08bCrXw6tbp+2 W+lLCOplBz4acbGQpMNI3A4bCQSSQ6GiDgS0lWR5x5Uk6IKADX2QHYIYlzH1nQjs5Q EvA/PcLgk/7YY4TSl26hApT4yp1g4DFz29ydH3Lo= X-SMAIL-HELO: localhost.localdomain Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain)([114.249.62.144]) by sina.com (10.54.253.32) with ESMTP id 6A4E41870000073A; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 20:24:41 +0800 (CST) X-Sender: hdanton@sina.com X-Auth-ID: hdanton@sina.com Authentication-Results: sina.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=hdanton@sina.com; dkim=none header.i=none; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hdanton@sina.com X-SMAIL-MID: 3139324456874 X-SMAIL-UIID: 4D8F1B5FC0FF458489170AE260210F19-20260708-202441-1 From: Hillf Danton To: Yuan Tan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] VEGA: a syzbot-like workflow for LLM-found kernel bugs Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 20:24:28 +0800 Message-ID: <20260708122429.461-1-hdanton@sina.com> In-Reply-To: <20260708092247.4188498-1-yuantan098@gmail.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 02:22:47AM -0700, Yuan Tan wrote: > Hi all, > > We would like to ask for feedback on a proposed workflow for reporting Linux > kernel bugs found by an LLM-assisted code auditing tool that we have > been developing since earlier this year. > > Since February, we have been developing an LLM-driven kernel code auditing > tool called VEGA. It started as a side project, but the results became much > substantial than we expected: VEGA has found hundreds of valid bugs in Linux > kernel. > > That immediately created a practical problem: we do not want to dump a large > pile of bug reports onto mail lists and annoy the maintainers. > Given the syzbot reports, I think less than 11 true vega reports a day will not trigger a panic.