From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4170C27B4F7; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 20:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761079376; cv=none; b=TypYtxh2Tj5xuxabOAaso6Innv//lDiVr6lP+sFR1uVKOLnjEGu5I2iZwAWdCmbPBhb0uAHkY2jyh694l9Q+wGUa7eD9D1aO/PZ4rMfFnZjUQUq6Fh1qDkeu2P885T7MzfjCcGtIqivwF35Ag3i6T7QZjt6ze1uBVGGgT9c6v/4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761079376; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DWvaHmyhKJXb9JSMX4e2ZfHXF6vP/qJBWO8gl/HIyIg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gGYgXlmZgN7NxB0gW5WU+2AXh8xczqpNU1xOePH2artERNbx4GZFPVkKNk6ikzq+JvbfvM0m3dB8rly3et0LAtKs+Oa4PSLX/5cIwI9rDWtEf9D68/xJmnwjvnUEylXcPrBGTirhIVPHANuI2e1OOo9icfiH3aBedQ1bYMNpmhw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=k0c4FtHb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="k0c4FtHb" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 555AA40B28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1761079374; bh=coYt7rpSENqvpyIscPukz78OuO3T7USEqh8+Qeq5GLY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=k0c4FtHbueMN51dXgX10rYfCxk9FkJDOCjl/S9ATAnBK4Z+DEJ7bXfldOOlMPYeg7 vUDGLVqtc61TC+KyQBqp2lMMv4tMjgSmhVAf2jGpg8kQ+fght8xb4XP7vuhHg2ctWH 6aukMuP48J1/IAeOEM69/8LdBUeVahVf3bnhYXeQZXmtl+GGxTe3nCi/dvlwhYgJoQ gxgekaP7Ux6nCM/bY7wMnfBSFYk2t7TOfD1lTXXP8bo/td7sYal5T6IOut+d0nSuy5 giorUw1gseouX4/yPRm9bcabxwsN1lZDz22U7IAnROwYRUvzhSGr4YoYpVCyA88gRY WUKTlZuym0zTw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 555AA40B28; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 20:42:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Brian Norris , Dwaipayan Ray , Lukas Bulwahn Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches , Randy Dunlap , workflows@vger.kernel.org, Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: checkpatch: Align block comment style In-Reply-To: <20251017203719.1554224-1-briannorris@chromium.org> References: <20251017203719.1554224-1-briannorris@chromium.org> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:42:53 -0600 Message-ID: <87bjm0t29e.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Brian Norris writes: > Ironically, the block style comments in the checkpatch documentation are > not aligned properly. Correct that. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris > Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap > Tested-by: Randy Dunlap > --- > > Changes in v2: > * Add Randy's Reviewed/Tested-by > > Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Both applied, thanks. jon